The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: neozeed@gmail.com (Jason Stevens)
Subject: [TUHS] 4.0 BSD confusion....
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:16:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+rfG9YLGmYw9vWWvoL=Tdfb5A1Sanz9wajzprL_SL7Sj-rLhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I was looking at Tom Yam's 4.0 BSD 'starunix' restoration project, and I had
a question about the version number that is reported vs the dates... I'm
using wikipedia as a source (I know I know..)

Anyways Tom's 4.0 boots up like this:

: hp(0,0)vmunix
87844+15464+130300 start 0x530
VM/UNIX (Berkeley Version 4.1) 11/10/80

But the wiki page lists 4.1 being from June of 1981, and 4.0 being from
November of 1980..  Did 4.0 BSD ship reporting itself as 4.1?  I guess there
is the possibility that the kernel may include patches to bring it up to
4.1?

Does anyone have tape dumps of 4.0 & 4.1 ...?

I did find some iso image that has various levels of BSD but they are not in
tape dumps but rather extracted to the filesystem.. the 4.0 & 4.1 from there
seem identical  Or at a minimum they use the same kernel that reports itself
as 4.1 ...

Anyways I'm just wondering....

Jason Stevens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20110829/388d110b/attachment.html>


             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-29 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-29 21:16 Jason Stevens [this message]
2011-08-30  1:04 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2011-08-30 18:37   ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-08-31 15:08     ` Jeremy C. Reed
     [not found]   ` <201108301459.p7UEx2Hr018173@chez.mckusick.com>
2011-09-08 13:10     ` Keith Bostic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+rfG9YLGmYw9vWWvoL=Tdfb5A1Sanz9wajzprL_SL7Sj-rLhQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=neozeed@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).