From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rmswierczek@gmail.com (Robert Swierczek) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:51:03 -0400 Subject: [TUHS] Non-US Unix Activities In-Reply-To: <2eefb902-e1b9-d56a-f116-4ea57cb03c67@telegraphics.com.au> References: <20170405222255.GA4109@minnie.tuhs.org> <20170406200839.GA30805@naleco.com> <20170406230910.GB30625@minnie.tuhs.org> <40464639-b217-1647-eae4-c3d2c3aa2d8f@telegraphics.com.au> <2eefb902-e1b9-d56a-f116-4ea57cb03c67@telegraphics.com.au> Message-ID: > > Yes, there's always SOME way to avoid it, but obviously significantly more > work. Just depends what the priorities are... Preserving fanfold seems like > a strange priority, wouldn't it be more practical bound book-like anyway? > > Or, similar to your suggestion, load it into a compatible printer (so that > it can be sprocket fed), with some kind of takeup spool, then form feed > pages through, snapping each one between feeds. > Fully agree! If there is anything I can do to help get that online (in whatever form) let me know. Are there any other surviving examples of B code from that era in this ballpark of complexity?