The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com>
To: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] non-blocking IO
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:45:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABH=_VRjxL=p8f+ePVvBWKuQN3aFE-BW4aE9MAcjwkK-Mm1rkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F364B944-42D3-4AAA-88DB-6EBBFEDF9F21@planet.nl>

The operating systems that I cut my teeth on (OS/360, DOS/360,
VAX/VMS) all had basic I/O system calls that were non-blocking.
Blocking I/O calls were all built on top of that framework.  I thus
found it curious that Unix took the opposite tack, and non-blocking
I/O was an afterthought.

So I'm curious as to what the rationale was for Unix to have been
designed with basic I/O being blocking rather than asynchronous.
Especially that non-blocking I/O primitives were the norm for OSes in
those days.

-Paul W.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-02 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-02 14:19 Paul Ruizendaal
2020-06-02 17:45 ` Paul Winalski [this message]
2020-06-02 17:59   ` arnold
2020-06-02 18:53     ` Paul Winalski
2020-06-02 19:18       ` Clem Cole
2020-06-02 21:15         ` Lawrence Stewart
2020-06-02 22:03           ` [TUHS] non-blocking IO - threads Jon Steinhart
2020-06-02 23:05             ` Rob Pike
2020-06-02 23:09               ` Rob Pike
2020-06-02 23:21                 ` Larry McVoy
2020-06-03  0:39                   ` Rob Pike
2020-06-02 23:12               ` Jon Steinhart
2020-06-03 16:42                 ` Paul Winalski
2020-06-03 17:57                   ` Jon Forrest
2020-06-03  5:38           ` [TUHS] Unix on the Arpanet Lars Brinkhoff
2020-06-03 12:23             ` Lawrence Stewart
2020-06-02 18:23   ` [TUHS] non-blocking IO Dan Cross
2020-06-02 18:56     ` Paul Winalski
2020-06-02 19:23       ` Clem Cole
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-06 13:29 Noel Chiappa
2020-06-02 20:13 Noel Chiappa
2020-06-02 20:43 ` Clem Cole
2020-06-02 22:14   ` Rich Morin
2020-06-03 16:31     ` Paul Winalski
2020-06-03 19:19       ` John P. Linderman
2020-06-02  8:22 Paul Ruizendaal
2020-06-02  0:08 Noel Chiappa
2020-06-01 23:17 Noel Chiappa
2020-05-31 11:09 Paul Ruizendaal
2020-05-31 16:05 ` Clem Cole
2020-05-31 16:46   ` Warner Losh
2020-05-31 22:01     ` Rob Pike
2020-06-01  3:32       ` Dave Horsfall
2020-06-01 14:58         ` Larry McVoy
2020-06-04  9:04           ` Peter Jeremy
2020-06-04 14:19             ` Warner Losh
2020-06-04 16:34               ` Tony Finch
2020-06-04 16:50               ` Larry McVoy
2020-06-05 16:00                 ` Dan Cross
2020-06-12  8:18                   ` Dave Horsfall
2020-06-01 16:58     ` Heinz Lycklama

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABH=_VRjxL=p8f+ePVvBWKuQN3aFE-BW4aE9MAcjwkK-Mm1rkg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul.winalski@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).