From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: clemc@ccc.com (Clem Cole)
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 16:06:55 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] Why BSD didn't catch on more, and Linux did
In-Reply-To: <20180207202654.GF29650@thunk.org>
References: <CAGGBd_r3K9kPvuHuCavzaX6ZS8qh0wMpYwOFA4rPNOoK7XJFLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180206230254.GB1977@thunk.org>
 <CAC20D2Ohuu1fGpGHbWp6acgaarJ6Eb2LmsvO_QZYFUNv=BTrbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180207151347.GA29650@thunk.org>
 <CAC20D2Mk-k8d7Q8+V3N3Dk3+cm1pvazZrmKkATaaCxs5445xwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180207194957.GE29650@thunk.org>
 <CAEoi9W6Cuky93zLoU1sSQvHWWC6KTEGt3BEUnnf+Gzcvg05pQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180207202654.GF29650@thunk.org>
Message-ID: <CAC20D2M5fMNnXAMjjhkEcJVMZavje+uXjy0impZ6+oCOtjqPfw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu> wrote:

>
> And *that's* why it was so important that MIT's Unix license didn't
> have the trade secret clause.
>
​But the court ruled that AT&T had made the ideas public so the any other
clause one way or the other does not matter.
ᐧ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20180207/8a394ba4/attachment-0001.html>