From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 245bf637 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 22:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0121894816; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:00:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7EB94790; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:00:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="RclXyxqH"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id ACE8494790; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:00:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F02693D35 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:00:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id l3so3496427wru.7 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:00:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fjkqsChf421kxAOvUFJdL12IDwDEbGOVt6aMKEWiIOc=; b=RclXyxqH53NNYVY8v0AgXqI5V0GsLWmS02PbdlXOOh3MN3gQVvRzxQ0J0R8nqMkJe3 xP7A1u0+TjGa41TPtTvtM9i7Xa99juY7b+dD5r5eaQCar46nToRkeC/He9lR55g0+Pa+ ufMLg1gMvYAX7dYe9xNFDzAsfH4NCa7q4zHbI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fjkqsChf421kxAOvUFJdL12IDwDEbGOVt6aMKEWiIOc=; b=NJjEMidPpWjRfg1mUDm7rhnRV2suxdVdelemDhMqWbwFgeu7jToU/4i2+aU78mGIsP /w7+jjI9wdszV1evmLXCjhkVb+JpsSWLXjZ2NxCYRGwfKwvOoGnUjif53D93lz95M98E kZKE5crpRyauTVg/9OYbdiIAxt5nN4Cbou/aHqHqwB2KnPMyt0t+UfJMs45FES+jFMhK fyaDFY/KugXwRnG+K9XvYgEpvndLHZMCsPkX9yVFzb8KoJQ/dRvwK/8wbw6q/WCi54YW a8ZuGX0h/vA6LesKFYQTVHkmJJ2D66xmkXjdxjemqErF3sk7TN4zA2QCH2gfvcJCI3gD 7d6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXmZjrPJO2q0scYetIT80pH9nhHb5ssKT6tbKHSQ8ASYvel8D0A FhgQAqL9IX/WS8RioEKAuNOwKyIRmaSnOOTanBpNaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNu5ys7huGMSb71jeMT04RNNf9xlZePyWl6px9JCD3ktoLIZFaW5YlbnocYA9AGgaIiuZ9lCe1UR/UTnJOuns= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e591:: with SMTP id l17mr32610279wrm.199.1568239221745; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:00:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190911181101.GF3143@mcvoy.com> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:59:55 -0400 Message-ID: To: Richard Salz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc402c05924e2591" Subject: Re: [TUHS] PWB vs Unix/TS X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000bc402c05924e2591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:18 PM Richard Salz wrote: > Interesting to speculate if that would have sped up the creation of OSF or > delayed/prevented it. I think the former. > It would have been created either way. The codebase was not the issue. The license terms and how the industry was going to play out (*i.e.* the economics) is what created OSF. --000000000000bc402c05924e2591 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On W= ed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:18 PM Richard Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Interesting to speculate if that = would have sped up the creation of OSF or delayed/prevented it.=C2=A0 I thi= nk the former.
= It would have been created either way.=C2=A0The codebase was= not the issue.=C2=A0 The license terms and how the industry was going to p= lay out (i.e. the economics) is what created OSF.
--000000000000bc402c05924e2591--