From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 15880fc6 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 22:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 14C859B8A5; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:24:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA8E9B892; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:24:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="S4Twwrdm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 96D2A9B892; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:24:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (mail-wm1-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428319B891 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:24:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r24so8728164wmh.0 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:24:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nwt32LMaF1okhknCVtxaV4z9GBfqOnBi/0BNQCvCVjk=; b=S4Twwrdm6LNYsppmubBfnp+6//SIM/DTVHDe3B18O5IK3oFC6iZ8YHPWlWT7NZVd27 9LN+ErBryJk0J5FwJGv0tI99Z0XxNXDZbCrUZ/SNI/IIC3q8NgNitBp0im/ClFpNCQjq UwlbPBQFTGdKdFJYPGAfqjicjb/GDNFOit3IA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nwt32LMaF1okhknCVtxaV4z9GBfqOnBi/0BNQCvCVjk=; b=njVWRiWW3PvHLdoWiXC6ho4HvN3EUfXakAAkFdfhtmhAwZcWe5ERRR5mwBFHjcDyWW N5nn33BdBKxbMbIO4etCWRS0rocO7AsVcIZSAOf6IoqVM0PXA6Pp7hPkbBsy0XrL9/Tb VjBTb1e0CSKuRxuiBs2bhGHQPiW+xbqMBvXekZ0F1T98FmuKCx4fSAwc52GStS74Hli0 T+8URaxqQNttMVuCNDzkH4IliwI2fTKORTe80PY0pbbMPf5jFp9vgZqbKQmmrIDBKiCO gjNze9LtVWRihTu7CoTsv3RjXnHeI42F6khuQ+3fbVs7rEQAgd8hj2jxFWjz2dsNOSqz qXfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaBdrbU2CFzW0gt5gzEZzVHM1rpRTrKMQZCEX5+o5YQvS7ePD2I xUxCc5Zx4F0Tlgsn0456VVycd3YcEbbNXlvKtCxnJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZEHZwIjT+6NcsxK/RhH0wiz59NZgrww4l1jUssOaWnpNmnRt1dPf78jNmNUA1HJq2mddP/3nBbpnovdkT/q98= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:30b:: with SMTP id 11mr10905319wmd.110.1549232654783; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:24:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 17:23:48 -0500 Message-ID: To: Henry Bent Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000103044058104d604" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Commercial UNIX was other stuff before X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000103044058104d604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:14 PM Henry Bent wrote: > This code was apparently so pervasive and long-lived that the GNU Fortran > compiler added compatibility for DEC extensions less than two years ago, = in > version 7. There must be enough demand for DEC's additions to have made = it > worthwhile. > Truth is most of the important ones went into Fortran-90 if I understand it correctly (I'd trust Paul W.s comments if he knows). Again, I'm not a compiler guy, but I've been known to eat lunch with a few of them :-) Clem =E1=90=A7 --000000000000103044058104d604 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:14 = PM Henry Bent <henry.r.bent@gm= ail.com> wrote:
This code was apparently so pervas= ive and long-lived that the GNU Fortran compiler added compatibility for DE= C extensions less than two years ago, in version 7.=C2=A0 There must be eno= ugh demand for DEC's additions to have made it worthwhile.
<= /blockquote>
Truth is most of the important ones went into Fortran= -90 if I understand it correctly (I'd trust Paul W.s comments if he kno= ws).=C2=A0 Again, I'm not a compiler guy, but I've been known to ea= t lunch with a few of them :-)

<= span class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-seri= f">Clem=C2=A0=C2=A0
3D""=E1=90=A7
--000000000000103044058104d604--