The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com>
To: Henry Bent <henry.r.bent@gmail.com>
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Research UNIX PDP 11/45
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:13:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC20D2MgcR3Lv67EKHNFuKE++TeM01ViQ7UK3h4r2aQCapxO9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEdTPBeN1tz_NHYmoSwhi34SQx07Hk=je_ycwrrcvJhW_ZSn1g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2003 bytes --]

Henry - the infamous Ken and Dennis picture:
https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/ken-and-den.jpg show the 11/20's
display.  Their is a console display is hidden behind the right most ASR-33
[the console for the 11/20, I think], and Ken is typing to another
processor - it's either an 11/40 or 11/45, given the parts of the bezel
shown in the picture.   The picture also shows 2 RK's, 2 DEC Tape and a
Paper Tape read/punch, and the Tek display on the table.

The Fifth Edition tape the low.s and conf.c list an 11/40 with drivers for
the RK05, KL, DC serial, and the PPT unit.  The Sixth edition is the first
time we see mch40 and mch45. There is also a rkunix, rpunix and hpunix on
the distribution tape.  The l.s file shows KL, DEC Tape, 9-Track and RP04
drivers (but no DC-11s).   We also see Ken's "sysfix" to deal with the
separate I/D space.

So ... I'm would have suspected that the first 11/45 had an RP04 as well as
at least one RK05, a TM-11 with a 9-track, and the DEC Tape unit. The
amount of memory is, of course, unknown.  It was pretty expensive in those
days, but I would have expected they would have pushed it to the max
[256K].
ᐧ

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 3:44 PM Henry Bent <henry.r.bent@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I asked this question in a different thread but it may have been bogged
> down in other discussion so I figured it was worth asking again.
>
> What was the hardware configuration of the 11/45 that Research used to
> implement early UNIX?  This would be circa late 1972/earlty 1973.  I have
> found numerous references to it being an early production 11/45, and I
> assume that it had an RK05, but I cannot find any details about things like
> memory size and other peripherals.
>
> Since the only extant sources are for V1, which was as I understand only
> run on a singular 11/20, and V5 by which time UNIX had spread it doesn't
> seem possible to infer a hardware configuration from existing code.
>
> -Henry
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3177 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-17 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-17 19:43 [TUHS] " Henry Bent
2023-07-17 22:13 ` Clem Cole [this message]
2023-07-18  6:25   ` [TUHS] " Lars Brinkhoff
2023-07-17 22:32 Noel Chiappa
2023-07-17 22:51 ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-07-17 23:05   ` Henry Bent
2023-07-18  4:40 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2023-07-18  0:49 Noel Chiappa
2023-07-18  2:06 ` Jonathan Gray
2023-07-18 13:10 ` Henry Bent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAC20D2MgcR3Lv67EKHNFuKE++TeM01ViQ7UK3h4r2aQCapxO9w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=clemc@ccc.com \
    --cc=henry.r.bent@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).