From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cb28234f for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 16:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BA21F950B5; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:27:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61544950AB; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:27:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="mdzwcbEb"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A3AC2950B0; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:27:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCFF94EB2 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:27:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id l9so23342598wrt.13 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:27:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NdIr2BXWBWjllP6jGyrrs2Cpf3FBpptA9b2L6rTkz1c=; b=mdzwcbEbFDlRdyxKptI2PTHzuoFWqYGRxLq8GqaPFgwEFUdkyOeWvUVxOYU1Xs1VEV H2lz2UT5/NHG3Ce3LIoHAEGqonTivhQ5TbGYof9BaoS3mOTYYftS+XH5DEYGx8a3QJJF 4AgT+VAk9XVfB/F46ERQRrRwmDLsMzJeX7Z0o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NdIr2BXWBWjllP6jGyrrs2Cpf3FBpptA9b2L6rTkz1c=; b=P3TR2FTu8LydckH0nIQp0wRDoSiLS2sKcfzkBha3KhxE24HPqJ8CDSrTr1EW2+YynN qxANQZzAYWuTtrfFlEf51VaHb/zmSljmC5fRwVSONLwILoZ+bG1KfLLR7BFGgLTBYeAW rS0s4VR+XVOcdG6ZowkTK0p58bCNce6cuh8YMPvgL/wh4iSQ1UmOpMVFbYO3MniDL+NN vEbLyJMSwjTIZd+Wq7HgL7Vd2fjZwpWHT11jzWwi96njyJqk04CtSFERJdFDQHeUnMxp q/T+r+MYMQea5jWwVqLnex26pYAiGZFT0CGAZgGkcG2tpDo+Go87QajPMKXeZXiRUuua tRhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdMgbAgxMZsy11UpLwxZMEZrohBeXwFPMYnshnJ8m/LD58Kwuqb 6Ldmwfjo3YHQ+TIyxfuz5QSyLonKNY+W6Yi1VrzJxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6HVvG1pXxEn68oKdhUiWE6zUlpz6eW0ZU/KZmmI6zviggCNCWWH3ywDJYesKiyKptHkxo8oqgeUowoa1Y7Jas= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64c7:: with SMTP id y7mr28018599wrv.207.1546100827067; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:27:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181229010900.19F6218C074@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <20181229013527.GA3844@minnie.tuhs.org> <82e23dba-38a4-3ee4-e35a-6293b8eef749@gmail.com> <20181229045913.GA21435@minnie.tuhs.org> In-Reply-To: <20181229045913.GA21435@minnie.tuhs.org> From: Clem Cole Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 11:26:40 -0500 Message-ID: To: Warren Toomey Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095aadc057e2ba6bf" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Deleted lib1 and lib2 in v6, recoverable? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000095aadc057e2ba6bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:59 PM Warren Toomey wrote: > Yes, order will be important, I forgot. There's no ranlib in v6 :-) > Good point. I've forgotten as to where and when did ranlib appear in the dev stream? Was it research, UCB or somewhere else like on the Harvard Tape? Just now, I took a quick peak at the 1BSD archive on TUHS.org but the subdirtectories are all packed up as v6 ar archives (cont.a files) - *i.e.* when somebody converted the BSD stp tape to a tar image they just wrote the archive and then rewrote it as a compressed tar ball. So I will take a little more work to unpack them, ensure the dates are 1978 based. (which I'll do at some point and offer them back to Warren). But I do remember when ranlib showing up it was such a win for fixing C compiler (well linkage) errors. I could have sworn, we had it was before V7, so maybe it came with the Typesetter C or UNIX/TS stuff. Clem =E1=90=A7 --00000000000095aadc057e2ba6bf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:59 PM Warren Toomey &l= t;wkt@tuhs.org> wrote:
Yes, order will be important,= I forgot. There's no ranlib in v6 :-)

<= div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif= ">Good point.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I've forgotten as to where and when did ranl= ib appear in the dev stream?=C2=A0 =C2=A0Was it research, UCB or somewhere = else like on the Harvard Tape?

Just now, I took a quic= k peak at the 1BSD archive on TUHS.org but the subdirtectories are all pack= ed up as v6 ar archives (cont.a files) - i.e. when somebody converte= d the BSD stp tape to a tar image they just wrote the archive and then rewr= ote it as a compressed tar ball.=C2=A0 So I will take a little more work to= unpack them, ensure the dates are 1978 based. (which I'll do at some p= oint and offer them back to Warren).

But I do remember= when ranlib showing up it was such a win for fixing C compiler (well linka= ge) errors.=C2=A0 I could have sworn, we had it was before V7, so maybe it = came with the Typesetter C or UNIX/TS stuff.

Clem
=E1=90=A7
--00000000000095aadc057e2ba6bf--