From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 11359 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2020 00:32:03 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Jul 2020 00:32:03 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 40C689C6B7; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:32:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193359C5E1; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:31:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="cHeV8ds1"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C61AC9C5E1; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:31:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com [209.85.222.179]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C05B94585 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:31:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id q198so30207966qka.2 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 17:31:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o3ul5yh9Vx4uwdVXS8sPtslqDH+tUtWZF3KKEUwWLxQ=; b=cHeV8ds1w87CwVFU1s6JTeCU4MiHfn0y14nb1WVUOXDcRYU7usBWqLLvEp6DYgzgy/ 6d1PXYp6Hw4CJgp1wxgzkynG+LeAG08gMveVYevxeqP+13J+9gi0KCGe4JTk+TLrOLnr aa8OJb0paihCK2CQ3aiH9m7wBRzAA2AoKPjCI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o3ul5yh9Vx4uwdVXS8sPtslqDH+tUtWZF3KKEUwWLxQ=; b=ruEsItuAX6+0SGUvCKikPe6BwnHuyKI+ZjZkfBOSb19DdutYaG2Y8taj1CNAPAYOxU g5yixyplFEFNb2l82LTZNxKXQtJKPiNk2kOcpCeYlIAfHOg1R4gx5c450rhadyycCzhk VJ2a/LpO/9wBhihJsf4OJs9hmDTAMgoYX/ylXVia+mD21CJDJBRptNxdXQK4DWQOsTmz Qt+XkspERv/pkRLSux0rrzg3sTOzfjpHk4Udvs7J4xpUjYrEVe+VL7UpnMwiuWFXvgPn xEFQdkUznbSqogqRuTKJSxh3/7fv0UZJMPvI+o1Aww22/5/QG9ZJhEefOPBMyiYse6zT sS3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531X3Y7wRwG273D5RJl7w15DBAG8fFydK12NHD6Q2b42ZCRzm4Mk OTpeseEsMMY+UvxNuGNZerpqe9rSOupRr2HP7s/7DXfO4CQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBvllBcVorSYiGzHSoc4NjV8znyxnjZxG7FveER23p7LubHb9JKgyjSLu/PmTXQyUKmU40TO6RfwAMf74Lb80= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:81c:: with SMTP id s28mr35610151qks.133.1593822677219; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 17:31:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <01f8f896-9921-6c55-8dc2-6b9859f2f230@tnetconsulting.net> In-Reply-To: <01f8f896-9921-6c55-8dc2-6b9859f2f230@tnetconsulting.net> From: Clem Cole Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 20:31:05 -0400 Message-ID: To: Grant Taylor Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082cf8505a992c204" Subject: Re: [TUHS] v7 uucp debugging help requested X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000082cf8505a992c204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Grant. I wrote e for Ethernet based ( ip/ tcp ) connections at Masscomp so we didn=E2=80=99t have hack the mailer at time. On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 6:46 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 7/3/20 2:52 PM, Adam Thornton wrote: > > I've built UUCP, set a node name, and set it up on the pi. > > > > I can execute uucico to send files, and it, frustratingly, almost works= . > > Which system are you referring to here? The Pi or V7? > > > From the Pi side, I see (with uulog): > > > > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:34.97 23106) Calling system v7 (port TCP) > > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:42.25 23106) Login successful > > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:44.44 23106) Handshake successful > > (protocol 'g' sending packet/window 64/3 receiving 64/7) > > uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:11:51.61 23106) Sending > > /home/adam/git/simh/sim_scsi.h (6780 bytes) > > uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:16:21.79 23106) ERROR: Timed out waiting > > for packet > > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Protocol 'g' packets: sent > > 86, resent 6, received 1 > > I'm a little surprised that you're trying to use the 'g' protocol to > talk to v7. I thought the 'g' protocol came out later for TCP over > Ethernet connections. As such I wonder if UUCP on v7 supports the 'g' > protocol. > > I think that Clem knows a LOT more about this than I do. > > I'm ignorantly asking questions. > > > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Errors: header 2, checksum 0= , > > order 0, remote rejects 0 > > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:22.51 23106) Call complete (283 seconds > > 5440 bytes 19 bps) > > > > So it's clearly logging in, and if I telnet in directly, the v7 end is > > starting uucico as expected: > > > > login: pi-uucp > > Password: > > Shere > > Shouldn't that be something more like the following? > > Shere=3Dv7 > > What does 'uuname -l' (or '--local') show? (I'm much more familiar with > Taylor UUCP than I am the UUCP in v7. > > > uulog -x on the v7 side has no output, and nothing ever appears in the > > spool directory, which I suspect is a direct result of the timeout > > waiting for packet. > > > > So my question is, what else do I do to debug this? Clearly the pi > > (Taylor UUCP) side is expecting something else--maybe an > > acknowledgement?--from the v7 side to let it know the transmission was > > successful. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > I've not messed with this particular problem in probably 2 years and > I've forgotten more than comments above. > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > -- Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual --00000000000082cf8505a992c204 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Grant. I wrote e for Ethernet based ( ip/ tcp ) conn= ections at Masscomp so we didn=E2=80=99t have hack the mailer at time. =C2= =A0

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 6:46 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org> wrote:
On 7/3/20 2:52 PM, Adam Thornton wro= te:
> I've built UUCP, set a node name, and set it up on the pi.
>
> I can execute uucico to send files, and it, frustratingly, almost work= s.

Which system are you referring to here?=C2=A0 The Pi or V7?

>=C2=A0 From the Pi side, I see (with uulog):
>
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:34.97 23106) Calling system v7 (port TCP= )
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:42.25 23106) Login successful
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:44.44 23106) Handshake successful
> (protocol 'g' sending packet/window 64/3 receiving 64/7)
> uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:11:51.61 23106) Sending
> /home/adam/git/simh/sim_scsi.h (6780 bytes)
> uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:16:21.79 23106) ERROR: Timed out waiting=
> for packet
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Protocol 'g' packet= s: sent
> 86, resent 6, received 1

I'm a little surprised that you're trying to use the 'g' pr= otocol to
talk to v7.=C2=A0 I thought the 'g' protocol came out later for TCP= over
Ethernet connections.=C2=A0 As such I wonder if UUCP on v7 supports the = 9;g'
protocol.

I think that Clem knows a LOT more about this than I do.

I'm ignorantly asking questions.

> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Errors: header 2, checksum = 0,
> order 0, remote rejects 0
> uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:22.51 23106) Call complete (283 seconds =
> 5440 bytes 19 bps)
>
> So it's clearly logging in, and if I telnet in directly, the v7 en= d is
> starting uucico as expected:
>
> login: pi-uucp
> Password:
> Shere

Shouldn't that be something more like the following?

Shere=3Dv7

What does 'uuname -l' (or '--local') show?=C2=A0 (I'm m= uch more familiar with
Taylor UUCP than I am the UUCP in v7.

> uulog -x on the v7 side has no output, and nothing ever appears in the=
> spool directory, which I suspect is a direct result of the timeout > waiting for packet.
>
> So my question is, what else do I do to debug this?=C2=A0 Clearly the = pi
> (Taylor UUCP) side is expecting something else--maybe an
> acknowledgement?--from the v7 side to let it know the transmission was=
> successful.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.

I've not messed with this particular problem in probably 2 years and I've forgotten more than comments above.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--
Sent from a handheld expect more typos t= han usual
--00000000000082cf8505a992c204--