From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20305 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2021 21:14:40 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Aug 2021 21:14:40 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CC6F59CA9F; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:14:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A759CA63; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:14:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="aMkFjZyn"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7B3AE9CA63; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:14:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com (mail-qk1-f181.google.com [209.85.222.181]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CE999CA60 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:14:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id c18so18041344qke.2 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:14:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yU3u5eLdU8PxMLGKyYtszM03hM/AkApXaV3S/HAbzTk=; b=aMkFjZyns98zdqdizkAovIb05tDnFx7qgtJJgBafRw/D6cigrTKOiof+YJBXFme/Sj I7/Y5/fGUFcRSS5sZDZm9BGGDIqAjl7yQAVp10W7nE+CDlc+vkLV4kg5uKISIv9WlyNA eTZtep0iKFMy6IlV5oZCubmin09xjgKMibTvE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yU3u5eLdU8PxMLGKyYtszM03hM/AkApXaV3S/HAbzTk=; b=BOO905uyrpypL7Jy9waLJr7/aMenayyql/57KZ8R31VU4ZJmuDpVRCS9qDVJA1VOX3 0+dWSWy1DrMDyH0UGXnmQmFRq61rWaplLOFdh4kAgVXXW1Q2uXsrGNA4gO0AAOupZ619 RfrUwvY4zCmTS5eD+INWnTOHo+rruVOsy+J+qkKvntDCCXKFknJbElLEa1guERndKsUK aIQ53LU6VSoRFtCazn0qTgcb3rfUCjfd+Hq8ECEUb7EgKPekt6xKgKcF90tOe3XWfAAo Gm68UKXrUPCr+6RWJufhVFpoviGqaUVoBUI6jzykRSW1682McdrDqFAGUPzb3kFfQmJN IP2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uSsWz+8+P8o7NitggHv7nsZwitFQZMCVHfHRj6b5GDyW2HSnU VvGBSCBNPm7B+piUIq0FSZ16yR8lwgNbpEa9decY4g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/amFDdUJ3GMFOBpu58JJD/mVrwq36fdYgxdaRCxb0v0JtoEQBfmh5N/AxuVgTU2KW2kipulFcUVHg5pCXNr4= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a647:: with SMTP id p68mr17536951qke.133.1627938861639; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:14:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210731142533.69caf929@moon> <40763c2d-52ad-eb01-8bf8-85acf6fee700@case.edu> <7wczqv3fzj.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:13:54 -0400 Message-ID: To: Lars Brinkhoff Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000907da405c89a0dff" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Systematic approach to command-line interfaces X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000907da405c89a0dff Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry bad cut/paste -- that was from CACM if its was not obvious =E1=90=A7 On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:52 PM Clem Cole wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:37 PM Lars Brinkhoff wrote: > >> John Cowan wrote: >> > Early versions of PDP-7 [Unix] used the same process model as Tenex >> >> I understand both Tenex and Unix got the concept of "fork" from Project >> Genie. > > > Should be required reading of all intro to OS students: > > Programming Semantics for Multiprogrammed Computations > > Jack B. Dennis and Earl C. Van Horn > > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts > > Volume 9 / Number 3 / March, 1966 > > [If your Internet search fails you and/or you find it behind an ACM > paywall or the like, drop me a line, I'll forward a PDF of a scan]. > > > =E1=90=A7 > =E1=90=A7 > --000000000000907da405c89a0dff Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry bad cut/paste -- that was from CACM if its was no= t obvious
3D""=E1=90=A7

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:52 PM Clem= Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:
=
=09 =09

=
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:37 PM Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org> wrote:
John Cowan wrote:
> Early versions of PDP-7 [Unix] used the same process model as Tenex
I understand both Tenex and Unix got the concept of "fork" from P= roject
Genie.

Should be required reading of all intro to OS studen= ts:

P= rogramming Semantics for Multiprogrammed=C2=A0Computations

Jack B. Dennis and Earl C. Van Horn

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Volume 9 / Number 3 / March, 1966


[If your Internet search fails you and/or you find = it behind an ACM paywall or the like, drop me a line, I'll forward a PD= F of a scan].

=C2=A0
3D""=E1=90=A7
3D""=E1=90=A7
--000000000000907da405c89a0dff--