From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a34273a2 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 704039B9AA; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:12:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897D79491B; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:12:35 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="ACpV/lX5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 631919491B; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:12:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8906194803 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:12:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id p13so24980001wru.10 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i046Vc/AIK5zJS6uMbwm6BdR9ZUQ9qqgbZUOtjt//mA=; b=ACpV/lX5U4w+HvVOKmkW4R9nZs6VpDQNd38BnGFqbNPNLpNa8/zqjGG4LmUDXwiFgh 4whTaPNZrGQTfjRvyG/ml6Bw749mkYJ9twubAPsmq5nWukz7J4XN/kSDtDF7aWvfRXG/ LGVIjhWRjdtaLbY/g0+VJ1yQ5vem+nXWSowg4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i046Vc/AIK5zJS6uMbwm6BdR9ZUQ9qqgbZUOtjt//mA=; b=NnRR1PPAe8xDLo344LRVS+0z79U0KlDG6BUW+FIPR28zB5ua4oTSy/MzpQT/yHexAm s5iHWgOYOPwNjNPxsJr1l4xRVqbHYoWxjrD7D+RiTQNGr/in4xeo5waJK5IVw4XGRYJ5 gRTKAYS95iH+cVs513R1nAEN2LnYL9CD1d0O9CrkoBhhPCu5OQXUiaNCcL0KuzYYl4nV jQIvLhPIBrIanhFNhAzdbDCPHirRjROeccpc7kNNZXWxCpno6G0xI7PzXG6VCrPMQqTL iV2WrfrX033SPhi/FFB4idSb4IDKRds9Ill124rM1dUR8dtXPj85ez+YB8gb8hJowKjt NfNw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9be/r0TwByM701IInH6XxvM59SXdt87PzzBCEod+/S5vAV3PZ YkPDY2bAmjiWga9yqdlP/RRqpPGEtCtU733OZoOaBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy9fQf7CiJrFnMOylWfH4q3wPIOGn2DjhtD02GM0VQi/f+npAGYVvSLS3iF6nDJLRka+p815Y+A4Ne27BKbQSE= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:56cb:: with SMTP id m11mr42940202wrw.255.1563372750916; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 07:12:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4c433dc6-6958-4b1d-aaf9-a84adaff7f01@PU1APC01FT114.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:12:05 -0400 Message-ID: To: emanuel stiebler Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000785bae058de11567" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Mach'86 X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000785bae058de11567 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 3:56 AM emanuel stiebler wrote: > On 2019-07-16 11:32, Jason Stevens wrote: > > > While this kernel does have mentions of multi processor support I > > haven=E2=80=99t quite figured out what models (if any) are supported > > Historically, the Mach MP work was done on an Encore system not Vaxen but I've forgotten which model and what the processor was. I wanted to say Encore used the NS 16032, but I'm not willing to go out on a limb on that thought. Bob Baron, Mike Accetta or Rich Rashid probably remembers. You might look at the code for Encore support, and that might give you a hint. FWIW: I've lost track of Bob who was at Pitt last time I knew, but Mike is still at Microsoft. I believe I heard Rich retired, but I'm not sure of that. Clem --000000000000785bae058de11567 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 3:56= AM emanuel stiebler <emu@e-bbes.com> wrote:
On 2019-07-16 11:32, Jason Stevens = wrote:

> While this kernel does have mentions of multi processor support I
> haven=E2=80=99t quite figured out what models (if any) are supported
Historically, the Mach MP work was done on an Encore = system not Vaxen but I've forgotten which model and what the processor = was.=C2=A0 I wanted to say Encore used the NS 16032, but I'm not willin= g to go out on a limb on that thought. =C2=A0 Bob Baron, Mike Accetta or Ri= ch Rashid probably remembers.=C2=A0 You might look at the code for Encore s= upport, and that might give you a hint. =C2=A0 FWIW: =C2=A0 I've lost t= rack of Bob who was at Pitt last time I knew, but Mike is still at Microsof= t.=C2=A0 I believe I heard Rich retired, but I'm not sure of that. =C2= =A0=C2=A0
Clem
--000000000000785bae058de11567--