From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31555 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2021 16:18:13 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 Dec 2021 16:18:13 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id EB8DD9D009; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:18:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D7A9CEF3; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:17:52 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="ruQjpmcp"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 409BD9CEF3; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:17:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com (mail-qk1-f170.google.com [209.85.222.170]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E14C9CEA9 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:17:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id f138so20286115qke.10 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:17:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JapZ1oc2man/Cd5g7axB7XK2SN9v5Bn1HBW9HUTLyls=; b=ruQjpmcpuphHlUfQi5zS3hJOWrQ535NRWFOosaZcJkzQ6KccwN98Ntyv20vijj/Pfp 8YTffj+L2bAcDfX0BtcpP/9r9jG0f89fz/HesMpiBrEXDTNZn6kZfImX9ucFWJE2q526 Z0vzkBReuebl0seUplIqTq3e7Q9Xj+M/dv4iU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JapZ1oc2man/Cd5g7axB7XK2SN9v5Bn1HBW9HUTLyls=; b=XruEh6i9UlnY55ytvIamFyUQRD/UpgyV8psLx40OQjCf1FpUe0kvqtqR/7aT3tz5su OiLCh+is+1sM6Py2iWqfoc6QFjeudvqNP9IEoTKwMjE6IotA3tZafoUG5d54wklrJTSa 2JVHQQxy7Mh361lGUFyhwbWF+CHSuvFxFoZtl2tyvrs06THXKfHHEX6KTf+dgdfZrFKx /zAfgybH2YW6vtmKbnGI4l85tu3tjb4komyMOQl/2ws0ShLkgvfi1He8FPFlOFZDy4uK kruU5Ya+XoIFdvG1Xn2RTMZ8yCgwQj8EKI8EN8xkFC6mlgx+5DCjMEhORx/VV7W7ThtU UgnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eNnAZm8bKgQtOjsG9z3IUV+46bAyaOWnHh7YWScnXBhCeefR1 xTMS9v935UhlUa801hA0VHqPcdkhe2GcK8jNA4WBng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFG/TI60r+8161CQHdacRBGSRwIUlPUS144o7XIV/jk2BWCe6XNTC0hwTkEQYBgFd0tgIQWc940wrv8RLUCzk= X-Received: by 2002:a37:b3c7:: with SMTP id c190mr19063581qkf.730.1640794668188; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:17:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <529fceae-2493-e9b1-c949-928e95e430e1@gmail.com> <202112291502.1BTF2926024814@freefriends.org> <3606ba6d-7d00-01f2-2a52-06cfb440dfbb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:17:22 -0500 Message-ID: To: Richard Salz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000058d4b305d44b47c0" Subject: Re: [TUHS] moving directories in svr2 X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000058d4b305d44b47c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Where and when did mvdir(1) appear? It's not in Research or BSD. FWIW: in the old days, I just used tar cf - . | (cd some_place_else; tar xvpf - ) preserving permissions. The hardlink scheme of cpio was the one thing it could do that the original tar did not. Clem On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:46 AM Richard Salz wrote: > Wasn't some of that handled by the mvdir command? > --00000000000058d4b305d44b47c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Where and when did mvdir(1) appear?=C2=A0 It's not = in Research or BSD. =C2=A0=C2=A0

FWIW: in the old days, I j= ust used =C2=A0tar cf - .= | (cd some_place_else; tar xvpf=C2=A0- ) =C2=A0preserving permissions.=C2=A0 The hardlink scheme o= f cpio was the one thing it could do that the original tar did not.<= /div>

Clem

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:46 AM Richard Sal= z <rich.salz@gmail.com> wr= ote:
Wasn't some of that ha= ndled by the mvdir command?
--00000000000058d4b305d44b47c0--