From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c05e3dd6 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CF281A2208; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:58:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B8CA1F04; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:57:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3A9A0A1F04; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:57:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com (mail-wm1-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BF8A220A for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:57:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a18so10802554wmj.1 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:57:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aFAJtvubEWUdAe8cnajo9i1h9w0a/WPOW/05nzyPbaE=; b=TYqXNGvd1Cuac0FoAdeAxRrbUGMKRWuQcFAHOY+ZX1zbxTBg58cJ6gp0cnW3W0ilE+ 3ZXmbUI8MLKtJp63zB8xQ1yHQquORlkvu+Z8a40JzT/R+Q3DPYxRrClBsKMnejKLbH7E oWcGaRI3Dk02quSn23mF5oSMu/cNiv9hmoV30= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aFAJtvubEWUdAe8cnajo9i1h9w0a/WPOW/05nzyPbaE=; b=RJr/aV+4RzTzrh0iefBExKf1gtqo/wa2pJzMr7d6i6nyZ8uAGUJAE5a+r3FCnjvz3I u9f1YxjA9XKRsBwRuAVAhMWhyigwkLiaZI7ymlOjczC2bJ5vlrG+wiu/708qrLzftJR+ gwBE2Zz5dSTszxkGPifp1yF+EH6GrmwodYRBoIrB+hpZ4yI3NTEQbjhl2pNZ2TDlfqV+ xzvv2mORCAlgV/O1sRbcc3nLimr5Db8gCnWHNxCS9w5ILIV207ST4J+o9yD82I086pU6 l7Wxhusiv72nVSUjxfJYuJtOL8KvwJ5GHKh1gZNfnRfRmJ4G7/rtU+Y2VnLdEUYc4KQ0 QGFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYal3LXKkUXV9ycIhDHye/9Mun1afLBvzZXtqPXLfMsZoIt0J9U 6wjmZ1SuTJjOnMoGQcLjv7+oNxlLLkJkFnRMh+vYDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WFGUnburmxprZXlVVpPlBgqRJSbqjM3T99BGyMqM5A9M3IOpgBW4k+Tv99tDgMdcOBt+sNE0LxdYQhRfJj6f8= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1383:: with SMTP id 125mr4126756wmt.71.1543957056694; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:57:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: To: Dave Horsfall Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e9c1b5057c3883a1" Subject: Re: [TUHS] ARPAnet now 4 nodes X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000e9c1b5057c3883a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable BTW: By Sept '73 there were ~20 IMPs and ~15 TIPs The total hosts was ~45 My March '74, the numbers had doubled. =E1=90=A7 On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:50 PM Clem Cole wrote: > That's correct. Although it was 1969. I just sent Dave the paper from > the IEEE Annals of History of Computing: 1058-6180/15 [2015] Called > 'The Production and Interpretation of APRANET Maps" by Fidler and Currie > =E1=90=A7 > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:45 PM Dave Horsfall wrote: > >> The ARPAnet reached four nodes on this day in 1969 (anyone know their >> names?); at least one "history" site reckoned the third node was >> connected >> in 1977 (and I'm still waiting for a reply to my correction). Well, I >> can >> believe that perhaps there were only three left by then... >> >> Hmmm... According to my notes, the nodes were UCSB, UCLA, SRI, and Utah= . >> >> -- Dave >> > --000000000000e9c1b5057c3883a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
BTW:=C2=A0 By Sept '73 there were ~20 IMPs and ~15 = TIPs The total hosts was ~45
My March '74, the numbers had doub= led.
=E1=90=A7

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:50 PM Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:
That's=C2=A0correct.=C2=A0 Although it w= as 1969.=C2=A0 =C2=A0I just sent Dave the paper from the IEEE Annals of His= tory of Computing:=C2=A0 =C2=A01058-6180/15=C2=A0 =C2=A0[2015] Called '= The Production and Interpretation of APRANET Maps" by Fidler and Curri= e
=E1=90=A7

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:45 PM Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> wrote:
The ARPAnet reached four nodes on thi= s day in 1969 (anyone know their
names?); at least one "history" site reckoned the third node was = connected
in 1977 (and I'm still waiting for a reply to my correction).=C2=A0 Wel= l, I can
believe that perhaps there were only three left by then...

Hmmm...=C2=A0 According to my notes, the nodes were UCSB, UCLA, SRI, and Ut= ah.

-- Dave
--000000000000e9c1b5057c3883a1--