From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5c42e10d for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id B15C59BD0F; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:04:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7299BC99; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:04:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="VmG3abUN"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id B30319BC99; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:04:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7E99BC42 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:04:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id t6so183609wmj.4 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=atVncK7y3LluCQxV9j1lp+CnqoeL848Si2zx0t/KPv4=; b=VmG3abUNKdF8gS5EHDMPrsuAs2kyxHyxx7Pk8bmcPUrgZysnbtCucQ6RjH2yVxlEz0 O32ZgCXd9D/kemo9JYI+4ctecaXmM0PiBnXrSlAGqRkv18IlP0GsXnOQBjicvPI9hswE Naqirt5PE3SC4oYPFS1LccvKpsweALeaQ4/t8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=atVncK7y3LluCQxV9j1lp+CnqoeL848Si2zx0t/KPv4=; b=ZuHzyyK8exyLU5Ql5nuoBo93Jki6rcH4cvb+Ure4+BtRlbt5E2qURyoQzi99U4Lhmw y0AOmI61mX5wkU23coW+RZv5siEizqJ1BnAOwM6Qv2A9PL5cq+PQTeijWDJJKGhInYT2 Ip/MyGuKkleRZBvbZypdMCy/fIKRqfstpTluzeG+HsQJwYszk21gAO+821BDDpHhhvEk AzSsY+OAgjPJt7b1oZfwEG1QfdzjaysWEGd0vCg34owM1d/eazxmLuRM38UAft1SxgJx N5yHduh5iW0uFhiDLorD23lBW5l4+UGVeBF9kcwk95kgpDdxOhiUFXcVKgtP+eD/+F9B qtWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJ64haCXj2a+zCJHt619EBEZWt+ou5DydPAajfuxcWJw0nhyt7 mGW2hkQkkYiZv8mKkrN+Qwy4rIl9bLwNFt1sFGpigXjEEJo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0d6wfnUx4ixwZ4223OSw0zyVByvHm4QHJuc/q9ETUtWtPjR4yx8IsqluS5Xt1qvG1DkQSXOyqe7ko5suh/ZI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2486:: with SMTP id 6mr5444648wms.80.1567001079523; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:04:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190828063045.GE75146@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:04:13 -0400 Message-ID: To: Jason Stevens Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5523805912ddeca" Subject: Re: [TUHS] If not Linux, then what? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org" Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000b5523805912ddeca Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If that's the MIPs code base, it is likely to not be there. I could be forgetting something, but I remember that DECnet was released for the MIPS products. It was on Tru64 and Ultrix, but is a 'layered product' so you needed a license to install it and it needed to be a late enough version that had switched to exposing a full OSI stack. That said, I do not remember/know how well it functioned talking to any OSI stack other than DECs. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:05 AM Jason Stevens < jsteve@superglobalmegacorp.com> wrote: > > > I have OSF/1 1.0 running on gxemul =E2=80=A6 > > > > Any idea on where/ how to configure OSI? > > > > > > OSF/1 Release 1 (OSFMIPS) console > > > > login: root > > Last login: Thu Aug 29 06:03:07 on console > > DEC OSF/1 V1.0 (Rev. 166); Sun Jun 07 19:23:34 CDT 1970 > > DEC OSF/1 V1.0 Worksystem Software (Rev. 161) > > > > # find / -name 'osi*' -print > > # > > > > *From: *Peter Jeremy > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 28, 2019 2:47 PM > *To: *Wesley Parish > *Cc: *TUHS main list > *Subject: *Re: [TUHS] If not Linux, then what? > > > > On 2019-Aug-28 18:19:21 +1200, Wesley Parish > > wrote: > > >Speaking of OSI stacks, I know 4.4BSD Lite came with some fragments of > > >one. OSI's dead and hardly mourned these days, but did anyone in the > > >Unix world ever get beyond the 4.4BSD fragmentary implementation? > > > > There was ISODE > > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_Development_Environment). > > I recall experimenting with it but didn't actually use it in anger. > > > > I know that DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64 Unix (nee OSF/1) came with a OSI stack - > > we had customers who wanted/used FTAM and I was surprised to find it > > came with the OS. > > > > -- > > Peter Jeremy > > > --000000000000b5523805912ddeca Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If that's the MIPs code base, it is likely to not b= e there.=C2=A0 I could be forgetting something, but I remember that DECnet = was released for the MIPS products.=C2=A0 =C2=A0It was on Tru64 and Ultrix,= but is a 'layered product' so you needed a license to install it a= nd it needed to be a late enough version that had switched to exposing a fu= ll OSI stack.

That said, I do not remember/know how we= ll it functioned talking to any OSI stack other than DECs.

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Wed, Aug= 28, 2019 at 7:05 AM Jason Stevens <jsteve@superglobalmegacorp.com> wrote:

= =C2=A0

I have OSF/1 1.0 running on gxemul = =E2=80=A6

=C2=A0

Any idea on where/ how to configure OSI?

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

OSF/1 Release 1 (OSFMIPS) console

=C2=A0

login: root

Last login: Thu Aug 29 06:03:07 on console

DEC OSF/1 V1.0 (Rev. 166); Sun Jun 07 19:23:34 CDT 1970

DEC OSF/1 V1.0 Worksystem Software (Rev. 161)

=C2=A0

# find / -nam= e 'osi*' -print

#

=C2=A0

From: <= a href=3D"mailto:peter@rulingia.com" target=3D"_blank">Peter Jeremy
= Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 2:47 PM
To: Wesley Parish
Cc: TUHS main list<= /a>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] If not Linux, then what?

=C2=A0

On 2019-Aug-= 28 18:19:21 +1200, Wesley Parish <wobblygong@gmail.com>

= wrote:

>Speaking of OSI stacks, I know 4.4BSD = Lite came with some fragments of

>one. OSI'= ;s dead and hardly mourned these days, but did anyone in the

>Unix world ever get beyond the 4.4BSD fragmentary implement= ation?

=C2=A0

There was ISODE

(https://en.wik= ipedia.org/wiki/ISO_Development_Environment).

I recall experimenting with it but didn't actually use it in anger.

=C2=A0

I kn= ow that DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64 Unix (nee OSF/1) came with a OSI stack -

we had customers who wanted/used FTAM and I was surpris= ed to find it

came with the OS.

=C2=A0

--

Peter Jeremy

=C2=A0

<= /div>
--000000000000b5523805912ddeca--