From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: clemc@ccc.com (Clem Cole)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:36:07 -0400
Subject: [TUHS] Did realloc ever zero the new memory?
In-Reply-To: <201509110630.t8B6UaYF010131@freefriends.org>
References: <E798E102-2C50-4AB2-92CC-188D05AA951F@kdbarto.org>
 <5962857.12872.1441915841364.JavaMail.root@zimbraanteil>
 <20150910202115.GH8154@mcvoy.com>
 <CAC20D2P_Gw-YKP8EHASFToTe_W0nfdcJabQ6_aJYnX0BhnPvng@mail.gmail.com>
 <201509110630.t8B6UaYF010131@freefriends.org>
Message-ID: <CAC20D2NncT+gcT_Xai6xkVCJ0XRD4d+FxjMM_MvmiZBrab_eXQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:30 AM, <arnold at skeeve.com> wrote:

> I would not say this applies today. The GLIBC realloc is very effective.


​Fair enough​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20150911/e849f4e1/attachment.html>