From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 1089 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2021 18:24:40 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jun 2021 18:24:40 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 71B3F9CA24; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 04:24:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBD39C9DA; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 04:24:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="OkvHbYpP"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 18EB49C9DA; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 04:24:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f182.google.com (mail-qk1-f182.google.com [209.85.222.182]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF3E9C9D6 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 04:24:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id j189so14659315qkf.2 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 11:24:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BD4mumzR8jYczz8PELlYil1NmtFbg+0gB0U4vrdkN3M=; b=OkvHbYpPOsJ07le/vy3Q21ttfjpXhUohAErDmLeTQyYgVPzMwMucoS/GWpHvXY7Zmm vT+mrqVVIweF+NYbyuCHip55T8TNqRKHbOzC/AnkvF/7pIMpUKy1kfMAvG2smDrzikhy jw/aZmC9NRuiAs4sX6Y/dYrLt8Q3ABy3cLF/4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BD4mumzR8jYczz8PELlYil1NmtFbg+0gB0U4vrdkN3M=; b=kPm2/8f6lTqUxe5p6IV/GKj23vWACubMi3MisqfUDb2v5hCFtb+vyR9G7JrnxobuMl CxiipqXROHsZOWPprxw1Buufk5MiOH0rsW7WLhhdAowxP5KFHgRBb8AM3/caD6jgdSRw DkwMNX9dx4gMmgUgY2Q2BQ5k7ESaugzLP7/fM058uuiOF7N/h34Lw9pCFigNUHiVJbhH GmuEU0XkywQTBJk0rKJZxD/6uy231whDh9vmBpN9Gm/fmuca2ICKop8SEPGG3UE10iqG sepPPGsLxUt4Yx22Rj+yeLRkom2spMQd6E6E0Wpyz99BWQYJM1s9S4mqBiOkxBJzSWsF tDCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Kb+IcBWvMzpA3IS2pSbR28CWYkGN/6gdPLH4eiPz1hdB0ldcz l+NAyznPJlJaSEs569wbeJ9/peB5f5Qd99nC9AZQ+LOSNRS4JA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzJkGcyxmDDHygV+2BkMmj2hkHdN1lw799uPGI9DoFemf8gySiBJrzredt6Ht4cqviKoERXr3XbzxKWBdnIkY= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:c010:: with SMTP id u16mr13500388qkk.133.1623003854532; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 11:24:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9CE2AC05-6B4E-475F-874F-426DD51A8859@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: <9CE2AC05-6B4E-475F-874F-426DD51A8859@planet.nl> From: Clem Cole Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 14:23:49 -0400 Message-ID: To: Paul Ruizendaal Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000038068705c41d089d" Subject: Re: [TUHS] 32V memory management: not quite V7 style swapping -- source code update X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000038068705c41d089d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul, You got me thinking and I'm curious if anyone really knows historically how many sites ran a 32V system? In those days (late 70s/early 80s) the universities that knew and and even many sites inside the Bell System, the Vaxen I ran 4.1BSD (say the Marx's brothers at Whippany along with the Vax in the underseas research lab were we put the AP I did for my thesis). There were a couple in Summit I know, and probably Homdel and I'm guessing in some of the operating companies, but I never got the feeling 32V was popular. The folks with Vaxen that I knew, if you were able to run BSD (4.1 and eventually 4.2), did. Later on the only non-'pure-joy' systems I knew were a couple of Ultrix systems because they wanted the support from DEC and IIRC were using FORTRAN and wanted the DEC compiler which only ran on Ultrix or VMS. Inside of AT&T, I personally think I knew more folks with VMS (Fortran being the key anchor) than those that ran 32V. =E1=90=A7 --00000000000038068705c41d089d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Paul,

You got me = thinking and I'm curious if anyone really=C2=A0knows historically how m= any sites ran a 32V system?=C2=A0 =C2=A0In those days (late 70s/early 80s) = the universities that knew and and even many sites inside the Bell System, = the Vaxen I ran 4.1BSD (say the Marx's brothers=C2=A0at Whippany along = with the Vax in the underseas research lab were we put the AP I did for my = thesis).=C2=A0 There were a couple in Summit I know, and probably=C2=A0Homd= el and I'm guessing in some of the=C2=A0operating companies, but I neve= r got the=C2=A0feeling=C2=A032V was popular.=C2=A0 The folks=C2=A0with Vaxe= n that=C2=A0I knew, if you were able to run BSD (4.1 and eventually 4.2), d= id.=C2=A0 Later on the only non-'pure-joy' systems I knew were a co= uple of Ultrix systems because they wanted the support from DEC and IIRC we= re using FORTRAN and wanted=C2=A0the DEC compiler which only=C2=A0ran on Ul= trix or VMS.=C2=A0 Inside of AT&T, I personally think I knew more folks= with VMS (Fortran being the key anchor)=C2=A0=C2=A0than those that ran 32V= .
= 3D""=E1=90=A7
--00000000000038068705c41d089d--