The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: clemc@ccc.com (Clem Cole)
Subject: [TUHS] Mach for i386 / Mt Xinu or other
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:22:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC20D2O7cPtAq=h8U8w-9CVkg3JVMfR3qyh4qk14+q9VWtA1JQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <635c06b4-0048-4951-95ca-283c64c30fed@SG2APC01FT017.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3914 bytes --]

Yes.  In fact, the CMU's Mach/386 code base became the direct start for
OSF/1 both the full (RI) and embedded uK (aka monolithic or mK) versions as
well.  The later would seed DEC Tru64 after being ported to the Alpha, but
the 386 version of the mK would become Apple's Darwin.  The RI (uK) version
is what we used for the Intel Paragon.   Anything called OSF/1 version 4 or
later is based on the RI.  Before that's probably mK, but you should check
the readme to see which base.

The joke, of course, was that microKernel, was not that micro (it was
greater than 1-1.5M and used to run these on 4M 386 systems).   It was cool
and the research version (pure uK) is very slick and has a lot of
interesting ideas.  I think it's interesting to note that we did all of the
core TNC development for the Paragon which was on i860 processor, on
desktop 386 systems with ethernets to simulate the fabric in the
supercomputer.

OSF/1 uK technology worked very well, in fact; it worked so well AT&T's
replacement for SVR4 was announced to be based on Chorus, which was a
European rewrite using a different uKernel technology specifically to
counter OSF/1.

Anyway, if you do a little hunting around the archives, it is quite
available.   Note it will want to boot from either a floppy for a hard
drive, as USB had yet to be created, so bootstrapping on more modern
hardware might be take a little work.   But it should work.   A number of
us that worked with it, are still findable and few lurk on this list.

As a side note, during the OSF/UI wars, I made a plea with the late Roger
Gourd (then VP of Eng at OSF) and some of the folks management team at OSF
to make the OSF/1 generally available for the 386. At time,  Linux was
still in the .9 stages booting & installing from a 20-40 floppy disks, but
still lacked networking and window system. 386BSD/FreeBSD was coming along
but not quite reached its stride.  The AT&T/BSDi case had just been
completed so the UNIX IP question has been settled. I could not convince
them it was of any value and to an extent it would have been competing with
their members (HP, DEC et al).

I've something thought that was a real opportunity lost.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:30 AM, <jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com> wrote:

> While testing a crazy project I wanted to get working I came across this
> ancient link:
>
>
>
> http://altavista.superglobalmegacorp.com/usenet/b182/comp/os/mach/542.txt
>
>
>
> --------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<
>
>
>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
>
> Subject: Mach for i386 - want to beta?
>
> Message-ID: <1364 at mtxinu.UUCP>
>
> Date: 2 Oct 90 17:12:19 GMT
>
> Reply-To: scherrer at mtxinu.COM (Deborah Scherrer)
>
> Organization: mt Xinu, Berkeley
>
> Lines: 24
>
>
>
> Mt Xinu is currently finishing up its release of 2.6 MSD for the i386.
>
> 2.6 MSD is a CMU-funded standard distribution of the Mach kernel,
>
> release-engineered with the following:
>
>                 2.5 Mach kernel, with NFS & BSD-tahoe enhancements
>
>                 Transarc's AFS
>
>                 X11R4
>
>                 most of the 4.3-tahoe BSD release
>
>                 Andrew Tool Kit
>
>                 Camelot transaction processing system
>
>                 Cornell's ISIS distributed programming environment
>
>                 most of the FSF utilities
>
>                 a few other nifty things
>
>
>
> --------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<
>
>
>
> Was any of this stuff ever saved?  I know on the CSRG CD there is some
> buried source for Mach 2.5 although I haven’t seen anything on where to
> even start to compile it, how or even how to boot it...  I know Mach is
> certainly not fast, nor all that ‘small’ but it’d be interesting to see a
> 4.3BSD on a PC!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170217/d5ae52fe/attachment-0001.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-17 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-16  7:28 [TUHS] Mushi and Bagu Rudi Blom
2017-02-16  9:36 ` jsteve
2017-02-16 10:42   ` Nick Downing
2017-02-16 13:49     ` Rudi Blom
2017-02-17 11:30       ` [TUHS] Mach for i386 / Mt Xinu or other jsteve
2017-02-17 14:22         ` Clem Cole [this message]
2017-02-17 16:13           ` Chet Ramey
2017-02-17 14:29         ` Clem Cole
2017-02-17 17:23           ` Warner Losh
2017-02-18 22:25           ` Nemo
2017-02-19  6:20             ` jsteve
2017-02-19  7:01               ` Steve Nickolas
2017-02-19 13:46                 ` Jason Stevens
2017-02-19 15:44                   ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-20 18:14                     ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-20 22:24                       ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-20 23:16                         ` Steve Johnson
2017-02-20 23:18                           ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-20 23:25                             ` Steve Johnson
2017-02-20 23:20                           ` Steve Nickolas
2017-02-21  0:12                             ` Wesley Parish
2017-02-21  1:05                               ` Steve Nickolas
2017-02-21 10:30                         ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-21 13:47                           ` Random832
2017-02-21 15:18                             ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-21 15:54                               ` Diomidis Spinellis
2017-02-21 16:38                                 ` Cory Smelosky
2017-02-21 16:48                                 ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-21 16:32                               ` Random832
2017-02-21 16:55                                 ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-21 17:10                                   ` Dan Cross
2017-02-21 19:44                                     ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-21 21:17                                       ` Dan Cross
2017-02-21 21:37                           ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-22  8:57                             ` jsteve
2017-02-22  9:56                               ` Michael Kjörling
2017-02-22 10:26                                 ` jsteve
2017-02-22 10:29                               ` Joerg Schilling
2017-02-19 21:19               ` Clem Cole
2017-02-20  0:29                 ` Nick Downing
2017-02-20  1:58                   ` Clem Cole
2017-02-20  1:29                 ` Cory Smelosky
2017-02-19 22:59               ` Derek Fawcus
2017-02-17 15:47 Atindra Chaturvedi
2017-02-17 16:55 Noel Chiappa
2017-02-17 20:04 ` Clem Cole
2017-02-19  5:48 Jason Stevens
2017-02-20  6:38 Rudi Blom
2017-02-21  4:16 Doug McIlroy
2017-02-21 12:02 Noel Chiappa
2017-02-21 12:24 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2017-02-21 12:57   ` Michael Kjörling
2017-02-21 15:02 ` Clem Cole
2017-02-22  1:50   ` Dan Cross
2017-02-22  2:25     ` Steve Nickolas
2017-02-22  3:11     ` Clem Cole
2017-02-22  4:07       ` Dan Cross
2017-02-22  4:17         ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-23 15:31           ` Nemo
2017-02-23 16:00             ` Clem Cole
2017-02-23 16:50               ` Nemo
2017-02-23 22:02               ` Dave Horsfall
2017-02-24  1:30                 ` Clem Cole
2017-02-24 20:54                   ` Dave Horsfall
2017-02-24  1:01               ` Jason Stevens
2017-02-22 10:16       ` jsteve
2017-02-21 15:15 ` Chet Ramey
2017-02-21 16:47 ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-21 18:58   ` Clem Cole
2017-02-21 19:21     ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-21 20:17       ` Clem Cole
2017-02-21 20:28       ` Steve Nickolas
2017-02-21 20:32         ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-21 22:58           ` Wesley Parish
2017-02-22  1:19             ` Clem Cole
2017-02-22  9:00             ` jsteve
2017-02-22  0:52   ` Andy Kosela
2017-02-22  1:04     ` ron minnich
2017-02-22  1:33       ` jason-tuhs
2017-02-22  3:18       ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-22  3:45         ` ron minnich
2017-02-22  4:06           ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-22  4:11             ` Larry McVoy
2017-02-21 16:25 Noel Chiappa
2017-02-21 21:49 Noel Chiappa
2017-02-21 23:10 ` Nick Downing
2017-02-21 23:14 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-02-22  1:22 Rudi Blom
2017-02-22  3:08 ` Cory Smelosky
2017-02-22  3:51 Rudi Blom
2017-02-26 18:33 Norman Wilson
2017-02-28 20:26 ` Dave Horsfall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAC20D2O7cPtAq=h8U8w-9CVkg3JVMfR3qyh4qk14+q9VWtA1JQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=clemc@ccc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).