From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3faccde2 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 95C89A1AFB; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 05:18:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964E3A1A24; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 05:17:55 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b=EeBzuiHc; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7A270A1A25; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 05:17:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CDEA1A24 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 05:17:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id h23-v6so10933170ita.5 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:17:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e1kM/HwoOYGRB9dv/saTJWu+v53bcz8Uo4XTYJlGSvg=; b=EeBzuiHct09An8Qc2eWHwgW2u5KTawn6syErZ9aJLsCNCVO4TAEoj9LZwotf/QCBgU FLU82Knj4O8JqERWEL/2LLmWNOL3gq5jafwgj4iXhMdQDpIELEwr7pIicZmsQAl1tO6N 7QZZYuBweP1twhtVwgMHZxP2ZDGvY04S/nutU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e1kM/HwoOYGRB9dv/saTJWu+v53bcz8Uo4XTYJlGSvg=; b=htkxKA9pPrTBOPAsp+FFd9+BRSxd8mWhSqOlZdwWPIl8vJOqWp1GTgwZh09cRM3UuQ aSmIhVv8EQB0QmdX6TREu6n8XnGhecmEfJLrN8lpPUzJ6IEKLUUG1rO5A5Dq/dMAKK9N J/D71QfNnlFxWBLjQrere78jpxFEqkzO8p1CYEEY8nid64r2Uaxzw5ZJ2/MneU4rrpZH tsDCawTqEj2+btmZIzsw/+2EdnwZhBPuEZ2OIP9i7IgWwYhG8U1IqBe1i2toyM9wRCMT vCJN0MibIjeRRp6Z5St8R784NKTudpxJDrSgwqaJcWYwFRkQaMajz5wwtpPPQgGnPe8o 8SNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BqlIKpmYRsdjoUGTH+g/wGFJkpd9JFlYE/Fg/CLkPeY90S94ck ll6JJ3uJfFJaSpv4JJlgWxVQHP4touFHdaSNvLgqQQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZk3ODuNdWQ1jlPyx68xk16U/nsLYwabvOTSmQ3Hm3Q31yWN8BZrebCAsZ8b18GezckMgha3ICI3GEILd79lpg= X-Received: by 2002:a24:c182:: with SMTP id e124-v6mr1561554itg.142.1536175072323; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:17:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180905034805.GA23662@minnie.tuhs.org> In-Reply-To: <20180905034805.GA23662@minnie.tuhs.org> From: Clem Cole Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:17:22 -0400 Message-ID: To: Warren Toomey Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007fbf71057524a165" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Speaking of legality... X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000007fbf71057524a165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM Warren Toomey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:39:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > I'm trying to recreate "a" source representation of the Venix for > > Rainbow that I have. It's a v7 port, and I have all the .o's for it. > > Most of the .o's compile, with the proper compiler, to the same code > > that are in the .o's, at least judging from the .c file of the same > > name in the TUHS archive. > > The question is, what are the legal ramifications of publishing my > > reconstruction? > > Good question. IANAL of course. Obviously, it's a port of V7 and the > vanilla V7 is now under a free license. So I would guess that you only > have to worry about the files in Venix which are different: drivers etc. > > Right, but the AT&T parts you need to be sure to attribute them, =E1=90=A7 --0000000000007fbf71057524a165 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM Warren Toomey <wkt@tuhs.org> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:39:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I'm trying to recreate "a" source represent= ation of the Venix for
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Rainbow that I have. It's a v7 port, and I have all t= he .o's for it.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Most of the .o's compile, with the proper compiler, t= o the same code
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 that are in the .o's, at least judging from the .c fi= le of the same
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 name in the TUHS archive.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 The question is, what are the legal ramifications of publ= ishing my
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 reconstruction?

Good question. IANAL of course. Obviously, it's a port of V7 and the vanilla V7 is now under a free license. So I would guess that you only
have to worry about the files in Venix which are different: drivers etc.
Right, but the AT&T parts you = need to be sure to attribute them,
=C2=A0
3D""=E1=90= =A7
--0000000000007fbf71057524a165--