From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d37d69a9 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 03:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 206199C103; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:14:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068F29C0F7; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:14:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="OufzQWMB"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D76D49C0F7; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:14:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f178.google.com (mail-qt1-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02669BDD8 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:14:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f178.google.com with SMTP id j5so23390246qtq.9 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:14:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yc+eYJo2TXGX1trHcdYKbaE751Ip9vs+lippXIYMcb4=; b=OufzQWMBmr81AETJFOz93WZkYgCf1+cE/CmqxMUGlQrG6GWL1Df7F0/kDz1roZaiC1 ipLos6DbX5WyKHAQ8Sac1eRltcLagpNVkEqBBsRNHUUmNRj4pXdMqsPCqhgQ/kuZeDlF 2S5vp0k0sAohMoN2b8JQFS/w9FdXSscEu4Q5s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yc+eYJo2TXGX1trHcdYKbaE751Ip9vs+lippXIYMcb4=; b=JV+xwTpMUvqgMxodaM7S4VEzbkHLWxFvuZuEsk+5iLblWIYSavOmMbE8ZfwfPB65Bn nNzwLB4WsAYRmM+olKbVmhSbhBqP2CymkfTsAMOb0AHRO0R5fshkeGB4Lxs6Zr0gTB86 1DLGvqi3ZpnEFRefrdD2NRPdVKoP7DTbKVcsrSbMr4FuiVY4FC/faY2F8z3kqLrQ5AYd xE85DoCMXRsqk0ZoGWx66T04RVN0GO0PlPEc8FHnVBi/ZGfwf56SpBqlfno9WnNoOLMU eDLko+7A3vyI8oe5eGTje4QWng9UqJYjCRy2lyiEytDqot1PqfxtTPlWHiyCB/wjRvDB flaA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXYCbLYvIkTBxJ7mFAyrO9VL/oJe5X0RiFOVEB6MDhGUbaV0uzR jEVJByHTEDOqQ13/BM/YsD05WLxCLebcsES03Wm6OB/vZ58= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqI45d3G2aDcI8xuxxI7Uxf+imc3UHF5PVcnPWZwr6/T3ZcU9NSYyE3AZaDMgF6Pebd72F48uFt/gEJ8q0574= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1c23:: with SMTP id a32mr10449490qtk.119.1579317252465; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:14:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200109012830.GC16808@mcvoy.com> <20200109020720.GG16808@mcvoy.com> <202001090423.0094NooZ379407@darkstar.fourwinds.com> In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:13:45 -0500 Message-ID: To: Michael Parson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d23b8c059c617342" Subject: Re: [TUHS] screen editors X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000d23b8c059c617342 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:35 PM Michael Parson wrote: > It's like 99% compatible. Exactly... As my old (non-PC) 10th-grade calculus teacher used to say, "I'll give you partial credit when you can bring be me a female that is partially pregnant." To be you are either compatible or not. I would have been ok to have had an option that you could turn on that gave you new behavior (but make the user turn it on thank you). BTW: the cX command's behavior I also find annoying visually, but it does not screw up 30-40 years of programming in my fingers. --000000000000d23b8c059c617342 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:35= PM Michael Parson <mparson@bl.org= > wrote:
= It's like 99% compatible.=C2=A0=C2=A0
Exact= ly...=C2=A0=C2=A0As my old (non-PC) 10th-grade=C2=A0calculus tea= cher used to say, "I'll=C2=A0give you partial credit when you can = bring be me a female that is partially pregnant."=C2=A0

To be you are either compatible or not.=C2=A0 I would = have been ok to have had an option that you could turn on that gave you new= behavior (but make the user turn it on thank you).

BT= W:=C2=A0 the cX command's behavior I also find annoying visually, but i= t does not screw up 30-40 years of programming in my fingers.

--000000000000d23b8c059c617342--