The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: clemc@ccc.com (Clem Cole)
Subject: [TUHS] Novell, not SCO, found to own "Unix"
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:01:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC20D2OmnNQY3hMQ+SZEmjj2X2wnT6Bk-hsNJ6maK8ZncKWGxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABH=_VR2QLgnPPLCgC-w1ePR8=sufEEG1SarkCrYOdA_sY02Tw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1593 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Paul Winalski <paul.winalski at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Back in the 1960s IBM was facing two antitrust lawsuits over alleged
> attempts to use its dominant market position to freeze the HPTC market
> while they attempted to complete and ship the long-delayed System/360
> model 90.  One lawsuit was brought by the Justice Department and
> famously dragged on in court for a decade.


​My favorite part of that story is that, IBM instead of sending exactly
what was required by the courts, *i.e*. the minimum possible, the IBM legal
team filled the basement of the justice department in Washing DC with many,
many tractor trailer loads of filling cabinets, mag tapes *etc*. 'Hey, here
you go, you asked for it...'

So IBM is being sued for anti-trust/monopoly position - what does IBM do
next?  They send a sales team to Justice and ask if the folks in Justice
wanted to buy computer equipment to examine what they now had in their
possession.

Furthermore, contemporary to the IBM suit, AT&T was also being sued by the
same Justice dept for belief that it was had failed to follow the 1956
consent decree and was using its legal monopoly position with prohibited
actions.   AT&T took a rather​ different approach of giving justice a
exactly the information that was required and no more.

Well, we all know what happened January 8, 1982 - the IBM suit was dropped
and AT&T was broken up.
ᐧ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20180329/3acf7cc8/attachment.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-30  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-29 20:51 Dave Horsfall
2018-03-29 21:19 ` Paul Winalski
2018-03-30  1:01   ` Clem Cole [this message]
2018-03-30 23:22 ` Nemo
2018-03-31  0:34   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-03-31  1:53     ` Wesley Parish
2018-03-31 14:56 ` Michael Parson
2018-04-01  0:13   ` Dave Horsfall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAC20D2OmnNQY3hMQ+SZEmjj2X2wnT6Bk-hsNJ6maK8ZncKWGxQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=clemc@ccc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).