From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: clemc@ccc.com (Clem Cole) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:57:50 -0500 Subject: [TUHS] Source code abundance? In-Reply-To: <20170306153317.GA23881@indra.papnet.eu> References: <23bbfb06-2de6-a9e1-0786-3f46d17c1192@kilonet.net> <20170306153317.GA23881@indra.papnet.eu> Message-ID: Can't speak for the *source trees* them themselves more than I have already, as they came from all over - BL Research, USL, IBM itself, ISC, LCC, UCB, CMU, MIT, etc...; but IBM negotiated a very extensive *SVR3 license* with AT&T and and marketed it primarily an System V based system with "BSD & IBM specfic enhancements". This license agreement was the basis for AIX shipments as well as all OSF shipments. While other places covered it, if you google around for articles from "Unigram/X"(Maureen O'Garia's crew) in the years of 1990-2000 in particular you should find a number of articles that described the transactions and how it effected the "Unix Industry." On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Angelo Papenhoff wrote: > On 01/03/17, Arthur Krewat wrote: > > Anyone ever looked at vetusware.com ? > > > > Google it with: > > > > site:vetusware.com unix source > > > > Is all of this stuff archived somewhere else? > > > > Since we had some discussion about AIX recently I thought I should ask: > Many sources claim AIX is Sys V derived. Hoever, the source code (of 4.1.3) > does not look like Sys V at all. Does anyone know the history? > > aap > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: