From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 11599 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2020 17:25:04 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Aug 2020 17:25:04 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 721DC9CABC; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:25:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEBD9CAB3; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:24:45 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="OeKpgru4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5CFE39CAB3; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:24:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com (mail-qt1-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF33B9CAB1 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:24:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id k20so3211397qtq.11 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:24:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BT02scTcjB5ia+/crBdDd9i3yGA1e3Csz/6BfkwvczE=; b=OeKpgru4rMIhHqHEDD34dDZi4MXn0sxmwBjHPPq0yRk+X6r5pyeL0g+12Kmnt04j4f fDXybhX/j1XTn2N3odMTJQ37XU7J3QReMjm3Nol0l29hn1MNT1/cmQHNjiVKvlKclj3/ s77HHip5f4NEubwTmHCIAnK64xBmM7Sx7U/SU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BT02scTcjB5ia+/crBdDd9i3yGA1e3Csz/6BfkwvczE=; b=FmIy+rmkDJebVwymEeFgWJC95r6qvxTqvJJ4YO2lyb+wrv5/SnFJGHqktXHXd7XDgD Z+LxdXvcJ9+DT15TBN8zXaNnlpH2EpaQTsQoWF3RDP9SW2f+u5uXM7r6VnNXzBuDKLJ9 tf9iTgTYU15rJxkHxPVHDduvpaQRkzhNZXfEekOEcl3FpKkEfSJ1PbjWztkmy7wrBUof E3eR5S7KWBcH3/IUr/Of/phpi0Oe7w1E4pNRdJmbS7DFk44FOS4gcwU0V7ocoqTt0nM8 6oGiCzeJTUvB0vs5pGze0oJPcLOyD9dZSW85Ou/bPOllUyrk+hhQC0vtBEitvCJ9impW acJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533P2z1g0IU+IXqGiZz0PWVIz1jiZUjQ7Tulo2Nd3GWuC8Tt68+M KgbZYKooEeNEfvmEdRV6OjUeU/CNuJP9LVCWWiRPdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPGaRaxxjmKF8vJBaAP2WyB5ALztS24YTuLVMhLU094rp0A0MCparGP/QI8rAlvwhc2zIqFQZeQNek/pCM3nY= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b38:: with SMTP id l24mr5012668qtu.33.1598289882670; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:24:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Clem Cole Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:24:16 -0400 Message-ID: To: John Cowan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b4806d05ada2dc7f" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Memory management in Dennis Ritchie's C Compiler X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The TUHS Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000b4806d05ada2dc7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" s/Purdie/Purdue/ s/RST/RTS/ sigh... On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:15 PM Clem Cole wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:09 PM John Cowan wrote: > >> Dennis's compiler AFAIK was never extended to anything but the PDP-11, >> both as host and target. >> > FWIW: I'm pretty sure that the Teletype Z80 compiler and I know my hacked > 68K compiler, used Dennis's V6+ compiler, not PCC as the base. I think a > couple of the microprocessor compilers that the Purdie folks created did > also. That said, the MIT RST folks suite for the Nu Machines used PCC and > those became the 'standard' which many of the 'JAWS' ports started. > > Clem > --000000000000b4806d05ada2dc7f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
s/Purdie/Purdue/
s/RST/RTS/

<= div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif= ">sigh...

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:15 PM Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:

<= /div>

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:09 PM John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
Dennis's compiler AFAIK was never extended to anything but the PDP-11= , both as host and target.
FWIW: I'= ;m pretty sure that the Teletype Z80 compiler=C2=A0and I know my= hacked 68K compiler, used Dennis's V6+ compiler, not PCC as the base.= =C2=A0 I think a couple of the microprocessor compilers that the Purdie fol= ks created did also.=C2=A0 That said, the MIT RST folks suite for the Nu Ma= chines used PCC and those became the 'standard' which many of the &= #39;JAWS' ports started.

Clem
--000000000000b4806d05ada2dc7f--