Grant - The g (greg’s protocol) is correct. IIRC that’s the only line
protocol Dan distributed in the V7 original code base.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 6:46 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
wrote:

> On 7/3/20 2:52 PM, Adam Thornton wrote:
> > I've built UUCP, set a node name, and set it up on the pi.
> >
> > I can execute uucico to send files, and it, frustratingly, almost works.
>
> Which system are you referring to here?  The Pi or V7?
>
> >  From the Pi side, I see (with uulog):
> >
> > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:34.97 23106) Calling system v7 (port TCP)
> > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:42.25 23106) Login successful
> > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:11:44.44 23106) Handshake successful
> > (protocol 'g' sending packet/window 64/3 receiving 64/7)
> > uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:11:51.61 23106) Sending
> > /home/adam/git/simh/sim_scsi.h (6780 bytes)
> > uucico v7 adam (2020-07-03 08:16:21.79 23106) ERROR: Timed out waiting
> > for packet
> > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Protocol 'g' packets: sent
> > 86, resent 6, received 1
>
> I'm a little surprised that you're trying to use the 'g' protocol to
> talk to v7.  I thought the 'g' protocol came out later for TCP over
> Ethernet connections.  As such I wonder if UUCP on v7 supports the 'g'
> protocol.
>
> I think that Clem knows a LOT more about this than I do.
>
> I'm ignorantly asking questions.
>
> > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:21.80 23106) Errors: header 2, checksum 0,
> > order 0, remote rejects 0
> > uucico v7 - (2020-07-03 08:16:22.51 23106) Call complete (283 seconds
> > 5440 bytes 19 bps)
> >
> > So it's clearly logging in, and if I telnet in directly, the v7 end is
> > starting uucico as expected:
> >
> > login: pi-uucp
> > Password:
> > Shere
>
> Shouldn't that be something more like the following?
>
> Shere=v7
>
> What does 'uuname -l' (or '--local') show?  (I'm much more familiar with
> Taylor UUCP than I am the UUCP in v7.
>
> > uulog -x on the v7 side has no output, and nothing ever appears in the
> > spool directory, which I suspect is a direct result of the timeout
> > waiting for packet.
> >
> > So my question is, what else do I do to debug this?  Clearly the pi
> > (Taylor UUCP) side is expecting something else--maybe an
> > acknowledgement?--from the v7 side to let it know the transmission was
> > successful.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
>
> I've not messed with this particular problem in probably 2 years and
> I've forgotten more than comments above.
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>
> --
Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual