From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9742 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2020 23:57:17 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Sep 2020 23:57:17 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A4D919CB7F; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:57:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83759C73F; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:56:33 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JlLzUOgD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 63C4B9C73F; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:56:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f176.google.com (mail-qk1-f176.google.com [209.85.222.176]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A907F9C6B1 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:56:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d20so6331695qka.5 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:56:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9nU3quii1hnbPWgS1J5Is0TvSC+rmcp2e0qTt6Li0oI=; b=JlLzUOgDNiK8D0cBpzjAqtKKsM562VVTllVUDgLc140fOIE5yk8yhOscDjkkCtwSA5 1Ym5izznSPx/Eav49U2VOLD+MvTt9uysnYn8IYWnsjFrjkcVql7/0DYLrUoCo443SS43 WlumeG32JelB7RPAuHfKnA2D//9wTjnT4rCacrBt5PuP4fqoHEHB8is0Pk3f3dwvLDM8 BzVgPawhoASkgTJhZmuwii+71ohrNzZn7g6+jH19uaDM1ra2pw0yGHSFX7IhKNJ4Te0G zhZCQpswDzNloRgSKZsTsyH/rV1DUaux5nXVR7bEGxMZoQRrwDcyRSgXg23hOTv3ohtb kNDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9nU3quii1hnbPWgS1J5Is0TvSC+rmcp2e0qTt6Li0oI=; b=ogHDRJ+duGthWAzsJUcpBaEXYAqc3fTpWqdPq/i4heCd3wD9GYdkjW8RNtdIyXIOOX zrN9bsrWJntBeQtD/DIMumZNuiLtk0O9wWGUsBPewAspj8xadj27ELXIbe8KVdl937Bu ZiR38XvtEGK83J3dXWQHJDdVTFS+sEJ+k5194dPrpx+gPSskT4X0TYADh5GxOzEituoL gk2loFwrtssq934lOIizjAOjncX1L2wTV/a/mX0pQ62FvpdtsR/KA4DgfYU5zpj/Sqvs yJAIf1T8IsPqSB827dIpAGfbS3JV5djpo4ck9w2rcIng8dNMjMJKq57sdCPFjnxyKDAy 7Fdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326QoP6ByKa1kQcN6khVASIzSY42mzlkyT8vXcBLIHE3lbwbKKT Z25kExSh58I/4r7rrut0PVwvf2VpYV33OWfTt3JhHjNrZ8c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9SkFk3PPnCeD1Ban1mz1VoCcMSm35lVERnfEovucxZ+84AvYy7YavDMBR8I+I17txv46bUUxsb0izlvR/wgA= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a3d8:: with SMTP id m207mr19773905qke.175.1600214188292; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:56:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Gregg Levine Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:55:52 -0400 Message-ID: To: tuhs@tuhs.org, Chris Hanson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [TUHS] Historical sources for 68010 + 68451 systems? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Hello! Chris I have one of the later ones, a 133 in fact, and I've been trying to find what I could run on it. Never mind a case for it, plus power supply and stuff.... Can you share, off list of course, where you'd gotten it? ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:49 PM Chris Hanson w= rote: > > I have an MVME121 that I=E2=80=99d like to run some stuff on. I=E2=80=99m= planning what I=E2=80=99ll need to do to port MINIX 1.5 but since this has= a 68451 segmented MMU, I=E2=80=99d like to actually make use of it. > > Have any historical sources been published for UNIX on the various 68010 = + 68451 systems from the early-mid 1980s? I=E2=80=99m curious how they used= segmented MMUs. > > I figure at minimum I could have several segments set up to enforce prote= ctions and a stable per-process address space, but it=E2=80=99d be good to = have an example. > > =E2=80=94 Chris >