I think this reflects a very static view of hermeneutics.  Just because a term "meant" something at the time of its first use, doesn't mean that one should ignore all of the modification of that meaning subsequently.  Language is truly a virus of a type that evolves over time as it is adjusted by its tree of hosts.

I think you can separate the initial intent of a label from its current usage.

I wonder what mvs would have said to that.  Didn't he read sci.philosophy at one point?