The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rico Pajarola <rp@servium.ch>
To: Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com>
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] History of symbol preemption
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:40:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACwAiQnGghCWDENNou7+8qndDZC1UfiTHadWKDyt7HcbdH_nYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC20D2PsgKMtANSSQ2be4of8VDKCZZ5j7jmQYeGa6N5U532mfA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3082 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:04 PM Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:

> @ Rico I'm failing sure ELF came from AT&T Summit, not Sun.
>
yes, but unless my memory is playing tricks, SunOS a.out had this feature.


> @ Steve Johnson were you the manager when was created or were you folks
> still using COFF?
>
> Anyway... There were issues with COFF WRT being
> architecture-independent and supporting dynamic loading well.  Steve Rago
> would also be a good person to ask if you want some of the details.  At one
> point there was a COFF2 document, but it may have been System Vx licenses
> only.   Also, one of the issues was that AT&T had officially tied up COFF
> as a proprietary format -- all part of the 'consider it standard' trying to
> force their lunch down all the other UNIX systems throat which was not
> having it.   As a result, CMU's MachO was about to become the default
> format (OSF and Apple were already using it for that reason), and Unix
> International stepped in and convinced AT&T to released the ELF documents
> (I was on the UI technical board at that point).  I'm not sure how/why OSF
> decided to back off, maybe because after ELF became public it got supported
> by GCC.
>
> Now my memory is a little hazy... I think OSF/1-386 used MachO originally,
> but I've forgotten.   Switching the kernel to use ELF was one of the
> differences between OSF1 and Tru64 IIRC.
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:47 PM Rico Pajarola <rp@servium.ch> wrote:
>
>> This seems to have originated with SunOS 4. I believe a good proxy for
>> finding anything that inherited from or was inspired by this is a linker
>> that recognizes LD_PRELOAD. I wonder if there are other independent
>> implementations in the Unix space.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:59 AM Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) is the modern standard for
>>> object files in Unix and Unix-like OSes (e.g., Linux), and even for
>>> OpenVMS.  LInux, AIX and probably other implementations of ELF have a
>>> feature in the runtime loader called symbol preemption.  When loading
>>> a shared library, the runtime loader examines the library's symbol
>>> table.  If there is a global symbol with default visibility, and a
>>> value for that symbol has already been loaded, all references to the
>>> symbol in the library being loaded are rebound to the existing
>>> definition.  The existing value thus preempts the definition in the
>>> library.
>>>
>>> I'm curious about the history of symbol preemption.  It does not exist
>>> in other implementations of shared libraries, such as IBM OS/370 and
>>> its descendants, OpenVMS, and Microsoft Windows NT.  ELF apparently
>>> was designed in the mid-1990s.  I have found a copy of the System V
>>> Application Binary Interface from April 2001 that describes symbol
>>> preemption in the section on the ELF symbol table.
>>>
>>> When was symbol preemption when loading shared objects first
>>> implemented in Unix?  Are there versions of Unix that don't do symbol
>>> preemption?
>>>
>>> -Paul W.
>>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4531 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-13 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-13 19:58 Paul Winalski
2020-01-13 20:46 ` Rico Pajarola
2020-01-13 21:04   ` Clem Cole
2020-01-13 21:40     ` Rico Pajarola [this message]
2020-01-13 21:44       ` Paul Winalski
2020-01-13 21:45         ` Rico Pajarola
2020-01-13 22:20           ` Larry McVoy
2020-01-13 21:42     ` Paul Winalski
2020-01-13 22:53       ` Henry Bent
2020-01-14  0:31         ` Clem Cole
2020-01-14  2:53 ` Rob Gingell
2020-01-14 19:21 ` [TUHS] two AIX items [was " Charles H Sauer
2020-01-14 20:31   ` Clem Cole
2020-01-14 23:22   ` Kevin Bowling
2020-01-15 16:41   ` Paul Winalski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACwAiQnGghCWDENNou7+8qndDZC1UfiTHadWKDyt7HcbdH_nYg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rp@servium.ch \
    --cc=clemc@ccc.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).