From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9084 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2023 20:09:45 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Sep 2023 20:09:45 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5236843105; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 06:09:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B2E43101 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 06:09:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-495f20c5832so981237e0c.0 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1694808572; x=1695413372; darn=tuhs.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Q/PFJFhVSa9/LTajl7Y4cKDfjTYKBe45u52L79WwuBY=; b=EsQaXJYrrvlqtQDtv70XjfRFKEPH37Jtr5EaxajXRo2+hKpgB1r/+BHz+1NQF87W5A vxX5ZnEBSRC8Rhp3Kbtng35EDuVmadxSapWnJ53zUn5udGTfTVnCEqfahwTYCg2KEsHB lYGkGiFGl+sh9gvWSx1RHp+wAcUwaZYPi0y5OKjCZRyNnzt/txufSXujxyh8sjac2Kpv mOJvAqE7c+j/hjTrCCG9KTYjYW3JUgRluz+QcpV0kYC7AM3jJzKpaI9yT88xnoPr2+Xd mSJmdXm45pC3O7T8Zrzpahrkd0qhjHCf9vC5mfZmMEJX4v1ugE/jMZHxrAmnClCIe6sx YyIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694808572; x=1695413372; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Q/PFJFhVSa9/LTajl7Y4cKDfjTYKBe45u52L79WwuBY=; b=sw3HREGoxs7qNbZjlLg0jAdB2NPnFJKtS0gaPF2FuIZG1mVc7E1li3ibtz6ht8WS6l PEyYcXgVn6nFqhvbjUJv2gYCboEGaFIMjtAGOVCQdLxZQSNP7KMZ2/H9O8duNmdogoJn pyR8y/FhuR3MR+9Yq6N6LWfhZvhzFpMBY1FP28kdE5s3bMl0kDjKTP+4LCJo5OzcFwdx xsFFa3ezcipjU+oxgWjW0nud9RwC9orkzPgt6uUf7ZDXJGybOd8hWgxOKKnYfvbe1YuW S2ndikA419xPQ57YpkZGm68SQkpoewcKxJ9Pp5KYC9noZzEczrorjYVw84mvuR5Prp5x cuSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YypccdM+U0pfTBH4v3KQ3bH21DjbF6I9OJrZXAnu9kRHmJP6Xb+ y+YOJKo7wSHUPA9PuE5Yf5pgrK8Z9C/Fdzb3khKX3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF0NtwKT0HQmatTMtoOUITpIWVZKc+aDUiz/b9QOjLE5+bJaqqS03z3QMg1xa0Vhcajo0mWzO/Uhwghrx/KgUU= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:eb82:0:b0:493:5363:d1dc with SMTP id j124-20020a1feb82000000b004935363d1dcmr3080719vkh.12.1694808572120; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:09:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202309132128.38DLSvEj026719@freefriends.org> <3963d4b9-a866-2e2f-d289-c4f261e1ca7e@mhorton.net> <202309150354.38F3sPjK015761@freefriends.org> In-Reply-To: From: John Cowan Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:09:20 -0400 Message-ID: To: Dave Horsfall Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7696806056b5ea9" Message-ID-Hash: A7J4DWH2BPAXJ4JNFVOW4R6Y6KSYBFSH X-Message-ID-Hash: A7J4DWH2BPAXJ4JNFVOW4R6Y6KSYBFSH X-MailFrom: cowan@ccil.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: The AWK Programming Language, 2nd Ed.: What's new? List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --000000000000e7696806056b5ea9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:04=E2=80=AFPM Dave Horsfall w= rote: > Are you really commenting upon the contents of someone's signature block? > My view has always been that it's okay to comment on them (within reason) but not okay to complain about them. In a .sig block, people can talk about whatever they want, as long as the block itself is not BUAFed or otherwise warlord-worthy. --000000000000e7696806056b5ea9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fr= i, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:04=E2=80=AFPM Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> wrote:
=C2=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> Are you really commenting upon the contents of someone's signature bloc= k?

My view has alw= ays been that it's okay to comment on them (within reason) but not okay= to complain about them.=C2=A0 In a .sig block, people can talk about whate= ver they want, as long as the block itself is not BUAFed or otherwise warlo= rd-worthy.
--000000000000e7696806056b5ea9--