From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5562 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2021 02:49:19 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Mar 2021 02:49:19 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D583D9C8DB; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:49:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42349B615; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:48:34 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="DuMvJJk3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 15D3F9B615; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:48:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com (mail-qt1-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5E29507E for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:48:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id f12so2793888qtq.4 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:48:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y3SREaQMfIBcnc1ULe/fomu7NPa6giCziOT9QpHm+wg=; b=DuMvJJk3TqdNGrt3+/FXdypIyMvW7KoOgRDAEXVD6rr11MotA6V1y4U/D1i8jtD2AN 0otLiNBb1JSIUxTlzXHjbdz39Q0GUU/Sdhwxg/MNTmS7DZhvTXHaPLhVF3k+1i/bbYl/ 5FL5EM8dYnrpOKdp4r8w3Gc6v0CILSrLe/IL/EwzeJMH7NWfUijbxvAZoEblox4U90w3 KEPl7GUDGbSHNn+umfah97AfyTyRk2kGHLJbPSjlnM0uEOeFwkUt+5dTUlwDoPiIp7MU PcRwsOfEbae7e58lab6DUc+6qLxehxa7cgqFXft3xdP/5ALNxgONVl5M9hyy3Xd54St1 gFsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y3SREaQMfIBcnc1ULe/fomu7NPa6giCziOT9QpHm+wg=; b=qp9s3hyGQtmQqI4A94sjCLBe0viGFoj7Kmjbghy1fIsiroxuJcjQXWzUiwE06vRxAK yFWUWwWBIK5RF0Kt1n+JqWYTD+xHYJDsVw7i5/5NzkOkicADJgtePblIfSPxoIrBR90s RCZP/RhGtmzpgA45y+wF1U8cinbm1t6vBbGkn0LWRdcp361gbac5pwQzIz5Rnq/QEyep e8OrPGTjoMztWuF0wL468m/OIO51xAQ4/QoXvAuQZ9epptOwIKD1TOqW8ogIA9gHPeyq yLlZiWbFkomn6g3Qib7zqFmaQJZbZxy3EdFgGTgy7zqu4ZLWowf280xf9q+tyXXLkvod GMJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531b2wnSlOQJr2cGbB2XKLLX4KWZfu4ps/mM0mdeacUTp3Sb7Oho vTBbRJGo3wIVyBlFfETil9YCAp0ZqwJ7nP+AqVpPyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgV80BpHz4ssBab9lEhLq0FiMsrUugjfLaDWOq2/oSiGVj7CoF3nf9Ef6JlK95a2Faw++IzhB3Ja0p5cFejs8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5145:: with SMTP id h5mr3980879qtn.362.1615517309220; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:48:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210309162128.692CF640CB6@lignose.oclsc.org> <20210309202255.3doIj%steffen@sdaoden.eu> In-Reply-To: From: John Cowan Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:48:17 -0500 Message-ID: To: Rob Pike Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000584bb405bd4defa7" Subject: Re: [TUHS] manual humour (was tunefs -m 5%) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000584bb405bd4defa7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:31 PM Rob Pike wrote: I'm curious when people (other than me) erred and stopped saying that ed > was the standard editor. > They haven't. When a vi vs. Emacs (vel sim.) argument is swirling around me, I explain that ex(1) is the editor I use. People say "But ed(1) is the standard editor!" To which I reply, "Yes, but I'm willing to trade a little standardosity for a little convenience." John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org I Hope, Sir, that we are not mutually Un-friended by this Difference which hath happened betwixt us. --Thomas Fuller, Appeal of Injured Innocence (1659) --000000000000584bb405bd4defa7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Mar 9, 20= 21 at 5:31 PM Rob Pike <robpike@gma= il.com> wrote:

I= 9;m curious when people (other than me) erred and stopped saying that ed wa= s the standard editor.

They haven't.=C2=A0 When a vi vs. Emacs (vel sim.) argument is s= wirling around me, I explain that ex(1) is the editor I use.=C2=A0 People s= ay "But ed(1) is the standard editor!"=C2=A0 To which I reply, &q= uot;Yes, but I'm willing to trade a little standardosity for a little c= onvenience."




John Cowan =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://vrici.lojban= .org/~cowan =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0cowan@ccil.org
I Hope, Sir, that we are not mutually Un-friended b= y this Difference
which hath happened betwixt us.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0--Thomas Fuller, Appeal of Injured Innocence (1659)

--000000000000584bb405bd4defa7--