The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
To: Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com>
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] reviving a bit of WWB
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:56:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_SVNZujYb+h=q6_bY6BiFa_BvxcGqPMQpsFFBzYEzMRQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC20D2Nmrrt-Hnd6M+BF+pX-su5rfZ1m31xtWUjymUDBDnsV+g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 676 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:57 PM Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:


> As the more and more features got added, the focus of the language changed
> ... ney Chisnall's 2018 screed: C is not a low level language
> <https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3212479>
>

Rereading that made me wonder: if someone retargeted an old compiler (pcc,
say) to produce i386 code, how much faster would it run than a VAX?  I see
that there is a pcc derivative at <http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/>, but supposedly
it has been heavily rewritten for C99 compliance and other things.

Not nearly as bad as the pile we got with 'modern' C++ [which I'm loath to
> use].
>

You should be.  It's loathsome.  :-)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1443 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-21 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-20 23:00 Norman Wilson
2020-09-20 23:53 ` Clem Cole
2020-09-21  0:00   ` Clem Cole
2020-09-21  2:24     ` John Cowan
2020-09-21  0:09   ` Warner Losh
2020-09-21  1:05     ` Clem Cole
2020-09-21  5:55     ` Steve Nickolas
2020-09-21  5:59       ` Warner Losh
2020-09-21 18:40         ` Paul Winalski
2020-09-21 19:56           ` Dan Cross
2020-09-21 20:50       ` John Cowan
2020-09-21 21:22         ` Rob Pike
2020-09-21 21:57           ` Clem Cole
2020-09-21 23:56             ` John Cowan [this message]
2020-09-22  0:54               ` Richard Salz
2020-09-21 21:39         ` Steve Nickolas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-25 14:19 Doug McIlroy
2020-09-28 17:35 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2020-09-20 22:51 Norman Wilson
2020-09-19  1:51 Doug McIlroy
2020-09-20 18:42 ` arnold
2020-09-20 19:28   ` Will Senn
2020-09-20 20:12     ` Steve Nickolas
2020-09-20 20:26       ` Doug McIlroy
2020-09-20 20:57         ` Doug McIlroy
2020-09-20 22:13           ` Clem Cole
2020-09-21 20:43             ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2020-09-20 20:58         ` Steve Nickolas
2020-09-20 21:33           ` Brantley Coile
2020-10-07  5:43             ` scj
2020-09-20 21:35           ` John Cowan
2021-02-02 23:08             ` Greg A. Woods
2021-02-02 23:47               ` Larry McVoy
2021-02-03  0:11                 ` Dave Horsfall
2021-02-03  0:19                   ` Larry McVoy
2021-02-03  2:04                     ` Richard Salz
2021-02-03  3:32                       ` Dave Horsfall
2021-02-03  4:32                         ` M Douglas McIlroy
2021-02-03 11:27                           ` Peter Jeremy via TUHS
2021-02-03 20:09                             ` Dave Horsfall
2021-02-03 20:13                               ` Niklas Karlsson
2021-02-03 23:46                               ` Tom Lyon
2021-02-03 22:19                           ` Dave Horsfall
2021-02-03 22:55                             ` M Douglas McIlroy
2020-09-20 22:15           ` Clem Cole
2020-09-20 22:47             ` John Cowan
2020-09-21 20:48               ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2020-09-21 20:46           ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2020-09-24  2:25       ` Dave Horsfall
2020-09-24  2:33         ` Clem Cole
2020-09-27  5:54           ` Dave Horsfall
2020-09-24 17:19         ` Paul Winalski
2020-09-24 18:17           ` John Cowan
2020-10-07  5:47   ` scj
2020-10-07  9:20     ` arnold
2020-10-08  0:27     ` Dave Horsfall
2020-10-08  3:08       ` John Cowan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD2gp_SVNZujYb+h=q6_bY6BiFa_BvxcGqPMQpsFFBzYEzMRQA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=cowan@ccil.org \
    --cc=clemc@ccc.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).