From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 2555 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2020 17:32:54 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Aug 2020 17:32:54 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CF67C9CA04; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:32:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F112393D54; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:32:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="h1HRc1/g"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0E4CE93D54; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:32:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com (mail-qk1-f170.google.com [209.85.222.170]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4859C93D49 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:32:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id u3so2690546qkd.9 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nzoajU9mOA6HRRttL3tE5dhiTuzLhqTCF2SoJIYhbnI=; b=h1HRc1/gv4TkViEwcRLuQiagybV05YvbZMKrh2XjdYHpurwmkQ1vPbSMXyCtpTonvC wOVl5BR/Py1fHHj9wwmRLr+rMBHpZgj2EBqrOpsXcNEMRtSSuX24hTXgnCiGtJyd2Xe5 txV36FDa02O4wUkKNRdygRdcj0f59FK4wiLkeuOgfKgEv22HwGFydTaeMrgIaO4xpDJW NYe9JqBfyb2VIMj09v3A0HG1bL9f0lVpkE5ueRvmf2HSedVdogLwKbhHWy4zeACIX3gA FxK8v/lkYkqTCEpD+ZQ1F654xI08haXnH+otcwl8Dgodekg9AXbbmxEf02WM4CMgXZrI EHDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nzoajU9mOA6HRRttL3tE5dhiTuzLhqTCF2SoJIYhbnI=; b=Q7i8OIhwtJD7lOheqdbvCPHWqDXq2lcfIKbjrV7TsmrMYm28VD8TWmCrb7JGMhbMq0 DkRk4O5aKJM0KQ6erxO3dWvI76TtEU6El4ObecI/LOnWQxiR7At85hCTuvD+X3TGheJ3 TJzbOVwHsqB4BAZO9b+2k95aM0wpVcI1DPBpGENMhBEz+WfKuyuPkl2HeaCiKd+P2h6p ISj/ngaPw6IF4pJXb7PX99rR1Ic2nwhhJ0nD9FMJn1Xm/GuPlEnWAL3q1Vr/ZUnEH7rw F06lKyjJxo+EaYa/Q723euARttDZGPOU96IiYUcwMj4RxIPMRcAMYfQAm/4P/qf5LEvH AByg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532efjEB+gd8ZDwamy7CBbjW3ydcgTCGvlYtWWuuwqpn17BYJtJ0 Ll6jszaSgPQuDqo+pAEwp/d/sPRDWphV9H2KonrrRXxDQoepGpJ9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFhrB9FhLUwbJrmapSaMgA3kmtUQ6DMhNc7BnT+Vkm9Zqpy4kzhf76qS6zQCpRrJROegDLALs0K2/rXD9/MV8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:908:: with SMTP id v8mr14003583qkv.118.1598463129439; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:32:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200826155908.674C418C0CD@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20200826155908.674C418C0CD@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> From: John Cowan Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:31:58 -0400 Message-ID: To: Noel Chiappa Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000048d1b05adcb3350" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Memory management in Dennis Ritchie's C Compiler X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000048d1b05adcb3350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:59 AM Noel Chiappa wrote: After Doug's message, I carefull re-read this, and I'm not sure it's > correct? > The PDP-11 has pre-decrement and post-increment, not the other way around > (as > above) - unless I'm misunderstanding what you meant by those terms? > Thank you! Post in haste, repent at leisure; but if I don't post in haste these days, I won't be able to post at all.... John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Almost all theorems are true, but almost all proofs have bugs. --Paul Pedersen --000000000000048d1b05adcb3350 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:59 AM Noel= Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit= .edu> wrote:

After Doug's message, I carefull re-read this, and I'm not sure it&= #39;s correct?
The PDP-11 has pre-decrement and post-increment, not the other way around (= as
above) - unless I'm misunderstanding what you meant by those terms?
=

Thank you!=C2=A0 Post in haste, repent at = leisure; but if I don't post in haste these days, I won't be able t= o post at all....



Jo= hn Cowan =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0cowan@ccil.org
Almost all theorems a= re true, but almost all proofs have bugs.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --= Paul Pedersen

--000000000000048d1b05adcb3350--