From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_PDS_PRO_TLD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22227 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2022 10:38:52 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Nov 2022 10:38:52 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D36241DE3; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 20:38:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pathfinder.casadevall.pro (pathfinder.casadevall.pro [45.33.112.193]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8F8741DDE for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 20:38:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by pathfinder.casadevall.pro (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0189D1F61D for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 10:38:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=casadevall.pro; s=mail; t=1667644717; bh=/4wpMh2nVGD9T7yAYfRX59y2vqRbVYA4dFUlMCE2RsA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=ai9IPk7K9rX5XSOQxIYGAloZaqvJdlDZ8Z3FZQxX6TY+Lhp3G+Pt+okZPTrqXPADA oPpD++5ovYzQ+3GnSrsqx7AbN7TAtqugsroiD7E4a7npxVA3ZpJKqNwe9ZISOq+cbS IYbXUXs1QwL2aAsr+2/rlHmcBm2hlRdAZE6PHamEMD5yupGkVbnahiBeQHwmPOZ6CL jzvA+rp5VgYJxU9uEbEoYMA3oVBN9iL8md62vqqdB3Nc0JwqpHwnxuKcU9j7beP9cl G+xeV82NKC2f4mL6xh5UqF4+I2obzpdGUvSFwrhAyWZTVvQWFD0Np/4bAkkEP5Ctn4 o3U58jIWUw9xA== Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id d59-20020a17090a6f4100b00213202d77e1so10392019pjk.2 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 03:38:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2h3MVAw5h1X82RU6SpNXlfPUxWTvr4QxBo9u70ZCJaiyqA22tU lAeQD6gIRvNiZZlg5Jl4IYJA9MNv9ZoPx5MY7Yc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4xaGG/Rgp94DBtK+kuyzhx9sIuj1BtOWN1POVa55Z8roCLCtFGMGTWaGW9Mk836iplAuCIJlLlFdMzikI0a4U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0a:b0:212:c44b:fffb with SMTP id pg10-20020a17090b1e0a00b00212c44bfffbmr59383611pjb.113.1667644714059; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 03:38:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221031191401.GN22806@mcvoy.com> <202210311917.29VJHxe6110870@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <16d7a543-8c34-3663-f0d7-14b588683d6c@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <15edc92b-983f-2bf4-c265-75384b5a76c5@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> In-Reply-To: <15edc92b-983f-2bf4-c265-75384b5a76c5@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> From: Michael Casadevall Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 06:38:22 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Grant Taylor Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cb11b405ecb6ca30" Message-ID-Hash: EYWBB6F35TQIFN6ZDNB4IVZHJYNKPDS6 X-Message-ID-Hash: EYWBB6F35TQIFN6ZDNB4IVZHJYNKPDS6 X-MailFrom: michael@casadevall.pro X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: tuhs@tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Four windowing systems on SunOS List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --000000000000cb11b405ecb6ca30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:37 AM Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 11/2/22 2:55 AM, Michael Casadevall wrote: > > I extensively researched this; there are infact copies of Pinball for > > 64-bit platforms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EPTfOTC4Jw&t=47s > > Which 64-bit platforms? 64-bit x86 and / or 64-bit Itanium? > > I've not watched the video yet (today). > > Both actually, since Microsoft included pinball.exe on the Itanium install disk. Works too (although there are complications) > > Pinball had problems relating to 64-bit FPU precision (and this can > > actually be reproduced by fiddling with FPU flags), but it did ship in > > Windows XP x64 Professional. > > My understanding is that Windows XP x64 Professional is 64-bit x86 and > not Itanium. > > There is also a chance that I'm misremembering things. > > > No, its just the worst product naming scheme known to man. > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > --000000000000cb11b405ecb6ca30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:37 AM Grant= Taylor via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org>= wrote:
On 11/2/= 22 2:55 AM, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I extensively researched this; there are infact=C2=A0copies of Pinball= for
> 64-bit platforms: https://www.youtube.= com/watch?v=3D3EPTfOTC4Jw&t=3D47s

Which 64-bit platforms?=C2=A0 64-bit x86 and / or 64-bit Itanium?

I've not watched the video yet (today).


Both actually, since Microsoft include= d pinball.exe on the Itanium install disk. Works too (although there are co= mplications)
=C2=A0
> Pinball had problems relating to 64-bit FPU precision (and this can > actually be reproduced by fiddling with FPU flags), but it did ship in=
> Windows XP x64 Professional.

My understanding is that Windows XP x64 Professional is 64-bit x86 and
not Itanium.

There is also a chance that I'm misremembering things.



No, its just the worst product naming = scheme known to man.
=C2=A0

--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--000000000000cb11b405ecb6ca30--