From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: (qmail 27338 invoked from network); 3 May 2020 16:54:10 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (minnie.tuhs.org: domain of minnie.tuhs.org designates 45.79.103.53 as permitted sender) receiver=inbox.vuxu.org; client-ip=45.79.103.53 envelope-from= Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 May 2020 16:54:10 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BD77C9C96F; Mon, 4 May 2020 02:54:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3711A9B934; Mon, 4 May 2020 02:53:54 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ahwVIzTk"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7E2869B934; Mon, 4 May 2020 02:53:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2130794621 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 02:53:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id j16so4527009oih.10 for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q15yWuudbPv1ZI9i+XMrO52H4bfXATEJ2xVFs20tNog=; b=ahwVIzTkSKA2aErADS3lDD/yavA3f261Gae+BNkC7oIjY6N/va4avTHX9UNReF6VAk xwfqfjN4b6umm0MLWcK3PMQCc/sQ1lA97kLnkpHbsgVPgS5igM7/3QJ9p1ABTlm0pxir Fv5pyIrBflxrS8EijZ9krNjZ48Zv0V1COcl1s7gPTBfjNMDguCaL1MI7nDYaQkKBmRHk cE5Y9JQyUeQ+ikRGWYtYwYeJ87nS93yfacfwLrYLxkyM/bdaCRqW1N4Kf91xz4C5Xbfi +KhKqFuu9qnlU/iduXa1q8vWAaJobuFcDOPEFx8BAHg+6Tvpy5c12xu0gry9Kl8gIphO 3xnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q15yWuudbPv1ZI9i+XMrO52H4bfXATEJ2xVFs20tNog=; b=Gf3p0HYNO7NYi5TEfO6t0mf+FhxlF9B+AbI6UzBj6g/lbIvjENDZbydpViNQ+wzrMS FSJPhvzuT5utAWltUq/4az76IzIWJ7GhqunEThyb5LA1sKWo6zgmlRf7r0vJl9nFyvo6 KNp/pqgQSdG0Jv6+EJk1F/eklJO7QVgyvGhpx/DzPUdNQqnY3OGku168UArnEuo7gJJ9 nGyA4nwzExXadERPbnYLg/9Cj+60/Vz256lBjoJe6/XOHdS8WnW7kXrRSg1ImzVJn7bi 2iI+gx6AgO+UcLHBpu4K1uT8msHkxf5n6iOGMBanWNHz/T4fD3t/X1FEYOj+Ms6xK1Oj o/qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puau3+KT2V2nXJ5ZrwzDXW3iLLJl5FAwD1LzC3m0DMmaA7O1Rp9D C0P7/XD1ZwHB1RwsaxsqAzLW7Sxw8FxyWgQvWX0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLbkXqI7smOOHV47Wo9IbNcV4gsz4LfdHtozn2kmTDiTOGfiZbcutkGRGHRZyd6yZPelNRn1fXCXrxFoA8R7f4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4951:: with SMTP id w78mr6688554oia.99.1588524831513; Sun, 03 May 2020 09:53:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2F4C604D-F01C-4A82-948A-7E77093B48A1@planet.nl> <21F16C75-62AB-422A-A43F-981407E11434@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Henry Bent Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 12:53:41 -0400 Message-ID: To: Clem Cole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004ca08505a4c142ae" Subject: Re: [TUHS] SDB debugger X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list , Paul Ruizendaal Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000004ca08505a4c142ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 12:14, Clem Cole wrote: > > Paul W -- do you remember if DEC TLG did a version of dbx for Ultrix > (Leslie might remember)? FWIW: I know that DEC had a number of different > debugger projects so on the UNIX side over the years, and I really don't > remember what was done for the VAX, as I was not there at the time. By > MIPS/Alpha in the mid-late 90's there was a whole new debugger stream that > had been developed at part of GEM, but there was another one that came from > MIPs too which was based on dbx. > Perhaps unsurprisingly, as Ultrix 1 was basically just 4.2BSD with some tweaks/addons, dbx has been there since the beginning as /usr/ucb/dbx. The binary in 1.1 has SCCS strings mostly dating it to '83 and the 2.0 source tree has dates that are mostly December '84. -Henry --0000000000004ca08505a4c142ae Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 3 May 2020 a= t 12:14, Clem Cole <c= lemc@ccc.com> wrote:

Paul= W -- do you remember if DEC TLG did a version of dbx for Ultrix (Leslie mi= ght remember)?=C2=A0 FWIW: I know that DEC had a number of different debugg= er projects so on the UNIX side over the years, and I really don't reme= mber what was done for the VAX, as I was not there at the time.=C2=A0 By MI= PS/Alpha in the mid-late 90's there was a whole new debugger stream tha= t had been developed at part of GEM,=C2=A0but there was another one that ca= me from MIPs too which was based on dbx.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, as Ultrix 1 was basically jus= t 4.2BSD with some tweaks/addons, dbx has been there since the beginning as= /usr/ucb/dbx.=C2=A0 The binary in 1.1 has SCCS strings mostly dating it to= '83 and the 2.0 source tree has dates that are mostly December '84= .

-Henry
--0000000000004ca08505a4c142ae--