From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: (qmail 29414 invoked from network); 3 May 2020 17:13:53 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (minnie.tuhs.org: domain of minnie.tuhs.org designates 45.79.103.53 as permitted sender) receiver=inbox.vuxu.org; client-ip=45.79.103.53 envelope-from= Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 May 2020 17:13:53 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 24C199C999; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:13:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EBF9B934; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:13:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="H8leneOb"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C82C19B934; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:13:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f41.google.com (mail-oo1-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EBA194621 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:13:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f41.google.com with SMTP id i9so1859598ool.5 for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 10:13:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c/GmqGewyqqWzNhAAmAWq5e+tn+n1Z4mx3sRzvOKwF0=; b=H8leneObXvzPRpsgmT9sFfiv0+30c+DIKzSc6fpacSq2ittw33meAcibDepp4tU6xM RdkKiCTzoTk4RNc1o1OGK7wnwZs3N+4SHZhCAz7Xw0VN8oj+B82NqGQpQhYyn8se16x8 xp5F6S5Db5LjCpLV0d47sUP4aSwr6vmoqryaHKD38YQVu1Jc8D7EiVsa3/HEA+XZznc3 j0YnVAjv5hTxSJz3172Th1PBx1balUQIumrMugYnQk/Sd1CDFA7mMBJGzBvXmS8VQ5vs 5HRUS8SJxPzZsDAabIThy8lnVqyeYFfKqc41X9ePu0ybYQuqDmHcH3lqJuTIGoYrtv5+ hp1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c/GmqGewyqqWzNhAAmAWq5e+tn+n1Z4mx3sRzvOKwF0=; b=o4EhQPXcSEDI4NpYEpeFwUJLUgIUuMhLxzuc9ic/zOVYH9rQbJ+A6WmPCS5HQlvWuw 00HrvfRPWtvbbGc3VEjD3FjYAjbfitATCPzZQCvQm4XCf5Cmmm7fWl22+z/qIl9S1uv7 PptKl6SbNh9EreAn/hFHFRpEZcFQsaUjoZUkk3+ZKpguEeLk0lCrWZTSbrniyugOYyvB LJtZFRPmDHZVnQp49jYIZkAa0SHyV7QShSgzIcEaWoXsuMYXpc7Ey1zx1Jatqa2y+NLD YXB/xAJ8ybQnH1Hbgpp7IXf4k6A8iGjhsTj2vSvfk5SVN6e08Ec/73c4HlCq+yEhhjfA 6Sqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaHtbW9Sv1xYc6LpNj1UGAbFxayQah/E8aky6GW82ArgdcSOtxz CKm5uR2zwPotbGbAIYaLzIURB3zuATVv3vuuX3A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI41EDLt735jMHPKF4F8VdnFonFwRkultJDY+lXpzh+W5HKOSvJ0u0K8Vsvs3wmBsfYnHb1mwQZ9yw8dKtzhfA= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:6259:: with SMTP id y25mr11768551oog.28.1588526013642; Sun, 03 May 2020 10:13:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2F4C604D-F01C-4A82-948A-7E77093B48A1@planet.nl> <21F16C75-62AB-422A-A43F-981407E11434@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Henry Bent Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 13:13:24 -0400 Message-ID: To: Clem Cole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c27c9a05a4c1881b" Subject: Re: [TUHS] SDB debugger X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list , Paul Ruizendaal Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000c27c9a05a4c1881b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 12:14, Clem Cole wrote: > > By MIPS/Alpha in the mid-late 90's there was a whole new debugger stream > that had been developed at part of GEM, but there was another one that came > from MIPs too which was based on dbx. > This raises a question I've always had - what was the relationship between DEC's compilers on MIPS/Alpha and the work the MIPS folks did? Early versions of OSF/1 on both platforms have tools that are very, very similar to the MIPS compiler suite - ugen, uopt, two-pass assembler, etc. - and I've always been curious what the heritage was there. -Henry --000000000000c27c9a05a4c1881b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 12:14, Clem Cole &l= t;clemc@ccc.com> wrote:
=

By MIPS/Alpha in the mid-late 90's ther= e was a whole new debugger stream that had been developed at part of GEM,= =C2=A0but there was another one that came from MIPs too which was based on = dbx.

This raises a = question I've always had - what was the relationship between DEC's = compilers on MIPS/Alpha and the work the MIPS folks did?=C2=A0 Early versio= ns of OSF/1 on both platforms have tools that are very, very similar to the= MIPS compiler suite - ugen, uopt, two-pass assembler, etc. - and I've = always been curious what the heritage was there.

-= Henry
--000000000000c27c9a05a4c1881b--