From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17415 invoked from network); 10 May 2022 19:09:47 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 May 2022 19:09:47 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id F101C9BDA4; Wed, 11 May 2022 05:09:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D38B9BA52; Wed, 11 May 2022 05:08:56 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kuwOWRXi"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 75E6A9BA52; Wed, 11 May 2022 05:08:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com (mail-ej1-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BB89BA39 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 05:08:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id m20so34816522ejj.10 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:08:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ctzbcGwQM8ExqMnUl0og9N4/oHguBwsPkmpnKf+BaQQ=; b=kuwOWRXihDpp4zPVrgxtvgh+1a592MIz5JE/zAM/gk1B9VX3iqyyzCrQ+jwl1fVYb4 rT8ZljaCkzLT1zUcV+k76zZbKwMCVMHBT/mV5XqQuKvtcKNsT9t8ByOTURy6MVdehUBZ a/TmzOuWcMbRGTjI5rggJXX5CDi13t0hg9eEhVFM7ewHUOqDJM6GiQ8sUcnVo0O082Hq 4+PwVi1o65k8V/riJgXLdfn81dU71Gn/0LmgHAQXnPLtr1nFW6FK1dK+SdCGezcnEUGh s94yrgqIcjoV4vzowk632thou+DZXxtEDixmBr8oOo8pXFQL7t18vAP99URWhtuVJVD9 4azQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ctzbcGwQM8ExqMnUl0og9N4/oHguBwsPkmpnKf+BaQQ=; b=n7Qn1HUlsg18DcQxAzwE/zjeq78E/xGU5r0s3K0XTMXz+Q1N4syyzsSo3nQEvULrqA Cyr0C8hB1XR6hoNEIkMSwQWUR1AXQzxkgJuFDCGUqVlpbaSEOHXrZLir4TuLXZQ4WGxb N3tNTKMftsfWaWwAorIbmem1YSlahYJ9hDpbiHH0D1rVKjOh1YWWL4zu1Dcb7HCU4TwC Fmvm0bawHqJGslbNaOvrnrcEgBwj7d0IX7Xmen+WI+kzhiS/PIvahDonynfa03pNW4Bz Pysa8NZnhXgI8HKUILJ4CMeRfTcA1aKnDPUNkt7bcaic6tSJFMIllBRqRVL7HrR29bJ0 kUZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zOhU8Yp8b+okS4Ay2iM6iONH6SBS/jEVyPj/ZyRUzuWy3PR00 D0o15UKDpqdmP+ngxPnJuVqKyAb6wWIW/R1WYLau/O/d X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGxcDYy6KwByvNMbW8yfYM7MXqd41/lsM8vgeacbDydBshC2sj2MP2dIH9f7zAwoD7+0U1C+qsBx0Hoph1uCY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d11:b0:6f4:7cf0:2275 with SMTP id gs17-20020a1709072d1100b006f47cf02275mr20944989ejc.72.1652209730973; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57977CE7-DDCC-4861-BBD2-843B9B9F51C2@ronnatalie.com> <1505232b-86bd-0d65-52c7-c8d19bd0663c@mhorton.net> In-Reply-To: From: Henry Bent Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:08:40 -0400 Message-ID: To: Clem Cole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001bf47105dead0e58" Subject: Re: [TUHS] First Unix-like OSes not derived from AT&T code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000001bf47105dead0e58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 13:21, Clem Cole wrote: > DEC had the original v7m which begat Ultrix, although I don't remember if > DEC ever shipped binaries on the original V7 license. > What was the timeframe on that? As far as I can tell from looking through the Ultrix 2.0 source code, the earliest modifications were in very late '83 and reference imports from 4.2BSD dated at latest fall '83. -Henry --0000000000001bf47105dead0e58 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 13:21, Clem Cole &= lt;clemc@ccc.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
DEC had = the original=C2=A0v7m which begat Ultrix, although=C2=A0I don't remembe= r if DEC ever shipped binaries on the original V7 license.

What was the timeframe on that?=C2=A0 As far as I can= tell from looking through the Ultrix 2.0 source code, the earliest modific= ations were in very late '83 and reference imports from 4.2BSD dated at= latest fall '83.

-Henry
--0000000000001bf47105dead0e58--