From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: henry.r.bent@gmail.com (Henry Bent)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:32:01 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] Source code abundance?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.02.1703011428430.91400@frieza.hoshinet.org>
References: <23bbfb06-2de6-a9e1-0786-3f46d17c1192@kilonet.net>
 <CAEdTPBcRiyeQYrc7vu63GsENC8yU7s-+BP8bakQvUJ3YAL39ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.02.1703011325190.87499@frieza.hoshinet.org>
 <32fbfeec-a3eb-796b-c243-5c6af478ea04@kilonet.net>
 <CAEdTPBcr7xERkN5do_LK+RkbfFB1qHs_CxrBpPe10JciP3pK0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.02.1703011428430.91400@frieza.hoshinet.org>
Message-ID: <CAEdTPBexn_X2CLLNk7w42ZWiwzU5qWLDuegTVbCb4gFUGro_EQ@mail.gmail.com>

Sure, I was referring to the AT&T source / porting bases.

That being said, I have seen numerous versions of Solaris source in the
wild.

-Henry

On 1 March 2017 at 14:29, Steve Nickolas <usotsuki at buric.co> wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Henry Bent wrote:
>
> My understanding is that System V source of any sort is not legal to
>> distribute.  I believe that source exists and has been archived for at
>> least some variants of SVR1, SVR2, SVR3, and SVR4.
>>
>
> Well, that's probably 95% true...the other 5% is Solaris. ;)
>
> -uso.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170301/af2205fd/attachment.html>