From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23045 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2020 23:28:47 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 21 Sep 2020 23:28:47 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8008B9CB75; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:28:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2BB93D5F; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:28:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="n5NQhisw"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id DFBE193D33; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:28:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265C193D06 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:28:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id c8so14461598edv.5 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:28:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+ormMNxzaFNVjpLanGGvLFx6h1TqvaAYQhkLAPAzMT4=; b=n5NQhiswym4mszeemR4b05g/MZFE/6PfGkIXc9zhPS5CWkK2SccwPoU/t1MO1BxLEc 17Zu8uZZkT8AvAlPPw1MF8mF9fv2hPvBKCnfh7V3EB89IlkFjOgWEj8toA6Qw6ICyYCo /NlWl8gvpJsBTZQ+FbEJ5QoHL+blNp8pbET4ts3IZMDqoFWcRNnKoUot+snMCfneNKZi zZCWCj8AmTUuRQfochUY+oac7T9eo2FbUfznulK4WG3FFh+Y05HjoNR1yvEWykMPb+qW bIRTN9NO4nDZveCVpMrtsj12ng7bU1LInH+TkjN/9g4tTT+qNaQndiUT14yCj2rsLV9v azFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+ormMNxzaFNVjpLanGGvLFx6h1TqvaAYQhkLAPAzMT4=; b=pFFRZUtKVsR6NWVB3rSgJaGDALal++nFilYXVarImuMmMx8iWvdRXy0RKMFojvEyNG 9tbNNRraXBEgRSCNgSUJJMIOqTZuuthD3PR3EH1RWRXFs6w+NqId93qEGEi0AUWMJCbm Mit8MgCvkswYVn2aoqOCjQqO+9jNF8+2+n2g1HbxEgYL240Omxr2LNbjnyPvjC0jUc2K fu7veWqlk1lJVAFZ5NA4gYzbHygzl27G73i8uxakA94vt6TV9nJ3aSv/QZVuNCdhv3sd xow7KMFd8f7028jVjs75YDmL3YYVOYtZ/5XD3t1/f873YwAIqq7C45hRYMMGHpbphwl+ kSsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532B1YaVJtyvqcbmIFs70gyyIzLJs8i3EBxhS2pRspdWgLDLOIW/ 7hAocK4jmRILQqAg1a2DYbl5ZBAcHw2MKyhs4iPHgYH8RUY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxUJLMQCbr3Fq9k+gsECHsTLxlXBd3TYii4FckOrF0XOpppYENyfZG/Y7HdJt6q9SWrdhVtTyvrKP6O9sDQ9k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1212:: with SMTP id c18mr1259524edw.344.1600730885553; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:28:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Henry Bent Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:27:55 -0400 Message-ID: To: Paul Riley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d0834e05afdb33ea" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Fwd: Choice of Unix for 11/03 and 11/23+ Systems X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000d0834e05afdb33ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 23:24, Paul Riley wrote: > > Team, > > I=E2=80=99ve read thru the FAQ and other sources regarding compatibility = of > Research and other flavours on the PDP-11. I have two physical machines, = an > 11/03 and an 11/23+. I=E2=80=99m choosing which version to use on each ma= chine. > > Is LSX the only option on the 11/03, or could I run V6 or Mini-Unix with > more RAM? > > From the FAQ, it says V7 would support 11/23 with kernel recompilation, I > assume includes 11/23+. I see 2.11BSD would also run on a =E2=80=9823 (an= d + I > guess) with 1MB or more of RAM, so that would be preferred. I suppose 2.1= 1 > would be preferable. > > I also have found another 11/23+ system from a seller here in China. > There=E2=80=99s the system, and a VT100, and a hard drive I can=E2=80=99t= identify. Here=E2=80=99s > a photo, does anyone know what it is? I may bid for it... > > Paul > > *Paul Riley* > Ultrix 3.1 should support the 11/23+, which would give you memory support up to 4MB as well as support for TCP/IP if you have a DEQNA. I don't think 2.11BSD will run on anything without split I/D which the 23 does not have. Without a closer view of the label I doubt that anyone could give you a definite identification of that hard drive. -Henry --000000000000d0834e05afdb33ea Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 23:24, Paul Riley = <paul@rileyriot.com> wrote:=

Team,

I=E2=80=99ve read thru the FAQ and other sources regarding compat= ibility of Research and other flavours on the PDP-11. I have two physical m= achines, an 11/03 and an 11/23+. I=E2=80=99m choosing which version to use = on each machine.

Is LSX = the only option on the 11/03, or could I run V6 or Mini-Unix with more RAM?=

From the FAQ, it says V= 7 would support 11/23 with kernel recompilation, I assume includes 11/23+. = I see 2.11BSD would also run on a =E2=80=9823 (and + I guess) with 1MB or m= ore of RAM, so that would be preferred. I suppose 2.11 would be preferable.=

I also have found anoth= er 11/23+ system from a seller here in China. There=E2=80=99s the system, a= nd a VT100, and a hard drive I can=E2=80=99t identify. Here=E2=80=99s a pho= to, does anyone know what it is? I may bid for it...

Paul

Paul Riley=

Ultrix 3.1 shou= ld support the 11/23+, which would give you memory support up to 4MB as wel= l as support for TCP/IP if you have a DEQNA.=C2=A0 I don't think 2.11BS= D will run on anything without split I/D which the 23 does not have.

Without a closer view of the label I doubt that anyo= ne could give you a definite identification of that hard drive.
<= br>
-Henry
--000000000000d0834e05afdb33ea--