From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23881 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2021 20:55:31 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Apr 2021 20:55:31 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 949D49C86A; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 06:55:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54179C836; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 06:55:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="jSTMoVzi"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8CE5D9C836; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 06:55:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9AB89C835 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 06:55:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id e89-20020a9d01e20000b0290294134181aeso24414017ote.5 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 13:55:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=spzjAg8a5XHDm3V2ArLsCcmzlmXR+uRlWAFWcz9DJfY=; b=jSTMoVzilNr8igoJrUpZ4UzgAvoG4JqZAH9ncM0uP4C5CgSQ7HQ36742IEIs4xplVe i4M4piVO2BRox5kIu60onxKMNQJvRzQS7DPzfhat2ivAyd2uAE4gAVeU8U9DLJFd+HlB nOsr9Kg3Y7u1slJhvWIDTFNLszBiYgu0kHvLaio15u48COsStjjjrGdSCVhEhXBvzuce 0nh2S7z2SWBTcHBbsZvPlRFK6wa916zL52GXYLnp4Fsk6X/QEE12eCD58HJcWp959/nP L5kcHgAJ6U8Szo+gGrwhH1W47wogkjApb9RTkquyScIDi2YTUZ87HxOQd6RsdUCmyZwe 0pvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=spzjAg8a5XHDm3V2ArLsCcmzlmXR+uRlWAFWcz9DJfY=; b=I/bWGsjk5joxotu4rLLn8pWVxFHjSkEEIER5Ste1KQ4J3wU05ZZSQGQpYnDVVaeVCg YT3YvvRWeZulvmZSC+3tfN9MxsirgK0seDzNne7WpLdGAqbls7wmF0z47cvFX6XRqeNv QhNyYbEsN7x56qETOVppiU6PQaD/y2DXHXOLgy+e+PtNRmHmtvVZyIC0Cwpt76qbcmYr krF6hDvoOTxsSs5SJosZEev24JNfBEkp0e86FhipD1gJg2BkvdhwKWNpAbjTjHIshoOd +20XOVR7maX7inXLxiBgN2dSqnHXAFTDwq8e2n2nFOBfTST2cF7tH859bAo67imukPoY d1Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324/hwR4NKLzKtkSRqHemAhYFRAU/lcZdzJMq08kBOaMkLkvpDJ btqODOMxnAMESS/rYXBGU9ejrguWgQ1VaRrSMnDideoM1Jc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcUkThn0TQDeIywiXjSGF/974lFWp05jap1SKHVT6OQ2TazV5Q8K3pHZjnIJ2l+pn/YMqInKVKPEnmCy1tFBc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2159:: with SMTP id r25mr11852553otd.313.1619384108081; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 13:55:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210425204842.3FAC4640CB6@lignose.oclsc.org> In-Reply-To: <20210425204842.3FAC4640CB6@lignose.oclsc.org> From: Dan Cross Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 16:54:32 -0400 Message-ID: To: Norman Wilson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008468e205c0d23e78" Subject: Re: [TUHS] pcc in 8th edition X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000008468e205c0d23e78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I seem to recall that LCC was also used, at least on 10th Ed. Am I imagining things, or was that real? On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 4:51 PM Norman Wilson wrote: > I was waiting to see whether Steve Johnson would speak > up, because I'm not much of an expert; but yes, the VAX > C compiler in V8/V9/V10 is pcc2. > > I think there are a few Research-specific hacks to add > additional stab info for pi(9.1) and on request insert > basic-block profiling for lcomp(1), but nothing major. > > Maybe we did some hacking on c2 as well. I know I did > a lot of c2 cleanup later in my personal hacking in > Toronto, but I don't think I did much if any in New > Jersey. But that's independent of the compiler (modulo, > I think, some of my later fixes discovered by using c2 > with a different compiler). > > Norman Wilson > Toronto ON > --0000000000008468e205c0d23e78 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I seem to recall that LCC was also used, at least on 10th = Ed. Am I imagining things, or was that real?

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 4:51 PM= Norman Wilson <norman@oclsc.org= > wrote:
I wa= s waiting to see whether Steve Johnson would speak
up, because I'm not much of an expert; but yes, the VAX
C compiler in V8/V9/V10 is pcc2.

I think there are a few Research-specific hacks to add
additional stab info for pi(9.1) and on request insert
basic-block profiling for lcomp(1), but nothing major.

Maybe we did some hacking on c2 as well.=C2=A0 I know I did
a lot of c2 cleanup later in my personal hacking in
Toronto, but I don't think I did much if any in New
Jersey.=C2=A0 But that's independent of the compiler (modulo,
I think, some of my later fixes discovered by using c2
with a different compiler).

Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
--0000000000008468e205c0d23e78--