From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ff17ff96 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 18:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6A04D9B8A6; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 04:34:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6DD9B8B8; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 04:33:53 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="BhLaYxeA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E84BF9B8A5; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 04:33:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com [209.85.222.179]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B729B8A4; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 04:33:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id x9so574859qkf.0; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:33:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MTQqA1Qi15JzbKQEorEWarZRzVQ3Rk6AXHDyJFLTWW4=; b=BhLaYxeAOjGnw5zsbtRoc9cR+M21xu8nK03kPfuVi1dFrzejtGBeBXughxhHrCaIgI 0mjn/ypcoiYj9p4Mnc8i7iGEdS8zinahA5Kjzp8dMFNUYfsI4bJWHMSqgxeHqod+DHHN tKFU69S8qOtsf3/NEswrwFQSXFLegjTJiWAZXDzytZ9zOdrAhq6NIS3N7XWJIg9aDqSe JUGBWE9XiOJZ2/ApVSOMuhoGOmPT7Y/v2llC8kNOdtFa54XKe3vsjt1DTV0B4lD4C68f A4bbIyF/fanOlTluPWO4TGVSzcL3UJb9iUv/w+aD03Y1rfhLPb2yXRviF7tS4WPLiM5F /zpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MTQqA1Qi15JzbKQEorEWarZRzVQ3Rk6AXHDyJFLTWW4=; b=SF73OOJy6uQZgwiGbu8SSBko8P922jiF1aLt0Qv4e8dffqPT1y1zgltA+pUI8PHroW hkGxvnBoiq6UQJ32vQwHHlr83PCoSbiRXr1f5YsT0rU86bF6nqSVxCmkgv7UA9jkm3mw 6FLO70TF+GQB8a8W9y+ph48GIkXt4hF5OA1xWpHkxId+nQnt4Os7OJoy1v6wVDY88J1w HrTB+wN9hPlpDosjTuMa9MarhVg2XBy8/5Shrgtq4jdn+MomhlcS2KmXYYZ9muJ1ckhD d4jA5KqcxWH86pYFecrCK5cZx7AzQE40JOlVcpaHRy9RHoYmOD1Q8GTm6HOW2nnuCz9s NthA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubcre5NNB6xeCSDxF8Ij7z9uv5xyJZdU8DiRYtl0uj0PjUIGj1Q BHACHqk3+ciPt0aGUSSOeZKd+NVczFa4nTJ6F7wHKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbWF8LEf9SbX35y8EYxsrah1x4ux9YlIeg6cUU6U/3llQmZeK5li4LU/wCgeMyIDS2Q7TM8r1oA+6+7g3tEqVw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:136e:: with SMTP id d14mr12070357qkl.344.1549564421938; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:33:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190206174913.E518318C07B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <0572e855-9aac-337f-4f1b-66dda3839e14@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> In-Reply-To: From: Dan Cross Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:33:05 -0500 Message-ID: To: Andy Kosela Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ed2c230581521440" Subject: Re: [TUHS] [COFF] OSI stack (Was: Posters) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS , COFF , Grant Taylor Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000ed2c230581521440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 1:22 PM Andy Kosela wrote: > On Thursday, February 7, 2019, Grant Taylor via TUHS > wrote: > >> Seeing as how this is diverging from TUHS, I'd encourage replies to the >> COFF copy that I'm CCing. >> >> On 02/06/2019 01:47 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote: >> >>> There were protocols that fit better in the era like DeltaT with a >>> simpler state machine and connection handling. Then there was a mad da= sh >>> of protocol development in the mid to late =E2=80=9880s that were measu= red by >>> various metrics to outperform TCP in practical and theoretical space. = Some >>> of these seemed quite nice like XTP and are still in use in niche defen= se >>> applications. >>> >> >> $ReadingList++ > > > XTP was/is indeed very interesting. It was adopted by US Navy for SAFENE= T > and created by Greg Chesson who was active in the early UNIX community. > Not sure if we have him here on this list though. > Sadly, Greg Chesson passed away a couple of years ago after battling cancer for some time. - Dan C. --000000000000ed2c230581521440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 1:22 PM Andy Kosel= a <akosela@andykosela.com&= gt; wrote:
On Thursday, February 7, 2019, Grant Taylor via TUHS <= tuhs@minnie.tuhs.= org> wrote:
See= ing as how this is diverging from TUHS, I'd encourage replies to the CO= FF copy that I'm CCing.

On 02/06/2019 01:47 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote:
There were protocols that fit better in the era like DeltaT with a simpler = state machine and connection handling.=C2=A0 Then there was a mad dash of p= rotocol development in the mid to late =E2=80=9880s that were measured by v= arious metrics to outperform TCP in practical and theoretical space.=C2=A0 = Some of these seemed quite nice like XTP and are still in use in niche defe= nse applications.

$ReadingList++

XTP was/is indeed very interesting.=C2=A0 = It was adopted by US Navy for SAFENET and created by Greg Chesson who was a= ctive in the early UNIX community.=C2=A0 Not sure if we have him here on th= is list though.

Sadly, Greg Chesson p= assed away a couple of years ago after battling cancer for some time.
=

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - Dan C.

--000000000000ed2c230581521440--