From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id df0d897a for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A48AB9C146; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:37:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B355D93D71; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:36:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Pwt6pOhv"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9684893D71; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:36:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com (mail-qt1-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BB893D59 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:36:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id o3so4570912qtj.8 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mbbRnQZH/lasNElaDSG+WYVf5Zi9e+Bguv+jlCWjLfQ=; b=Pwt6pOhvyyYX4x17ZABPLuu0IEjux9s9SC/xP/xQVu/GVr3r4kwX7gkJj3IwGC4Km0 LC4fRXGs7w1TIY7vEkxDRNZJL28xvBRCmlKEvHjZcsdGJr2ItjimFfMIWuY+K1ea6KRl IWkLD2Z7OJvLUHj7aG1uwAMWK9Rew8ge82MB99dPk6fKhrhX6nMjiwgHHOhS+LPIgdhg vgFbBLoCRbxyEblUUZ5qvQfF3S4NZ8XwEAY9dUUvjE7TjzRZUcwRzBVnO3gSO3HC5+yn M+NDNki9tUoqKtQhrg4yjHvwfNkpqr409LGaYBSjCAccmS4k6cRyeXMrGfMdpOwM5eFo Yl8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mbbRnQZH/lasNElaDSG+WYVf5Zi9e+Bguv+jlCWjLfQ=; b=VRLA4CLwXWQBPVh08gGMoeg9jAhn0asII9bsCaDojKfWQPq3HayXgJyjlQB6fgfikw foFE8Aq8CIP9bjXJSItn2eR1FSTdgAIax+qlfnxru9hN13lATsnTeISjl7SgIpjZH3cl qN839GKbxQLsqOssHqaL24+CEhlVpZS3PH9CZGvIAkQxAdmujYKpbhE+U+A/EgbuTTlC 1kKWE6K12meSVTCQIE/OkH+YULbwnFr0PFitsbWjW1T6bzTjIRKtv7YTImEGA9uCSqQI 7eFHlMb3HSVUI+MAEw8b4I9pU/53bdaTKfuolRmuFttSMdn+Bu5QJNL7ROyV6/FDtw6P wbxg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUew2j49Cs18p8MKL62j/jEKTAjlexT0E6z1/e+cJ1hhFrHLHWl zM4xNCXeD48uQpSjhw9VvKxSKfgsxxfFIMOjDejPjAan X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwHYvGjQl8xjk5HUx9UmqZIE6nm4F9612dxkxEL64rNzHADgRxEwLr9MyczSnUf6W7Y9BlYsuczFTT+FvOZC40= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6f57:: with SMTP id n23mr9625673qtv.46.1574357816773; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:36:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5df147fa-febf-2a7a-f38b-9f67429fca81@technologists.com> In-Reply-To: <5df147fa-febf-2a7a-f38b-9f67429fca81@technologists.com> From: Dan Cross Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:36:43 -0500 Message-ID: To: Charles H Sauer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006b17180597debeb3" Subject: Re: [TUHS] AOS and IBM/RT [Re: Amdahl UTS, AIX/370, AIX/ESA X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000006b17180597debeb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, 12:34 PM Charles H Sauer wrote: > > > On 11/21/2019 7:07 AM, Brad Spencer wrote: > > > ... I remember it being > > pretty stock 4.3BSD with NFS and minus YP/NIS. > > I'm puzzled about the "minus YP/NIS". I negotiated the IBM NFS license > on behalf of AIX, but was inclusive of the rest of the company, so I > think ACIS put NFS into AOS under the auspices of that license. I > remember discussing with the Palo Alto ACIS folks at the time. > > I only had AOS at home, without Ethernet, so wouldn't have tried to use > NFS or YP. But I would have thought that ACIS would have included YP. > AOS definitely had NIS/YP. I remember it quite distinctly. - Dan C. --0000000000006b17180597debeb3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, 12:34 PM Charles H Sauer <sauer@technologists.com> wrote:
<= /div>


On 11/21/2019 7:07 AM, Brad Spencer wrote:

> ... I remember it being
> pretty stock 4.3BSD with NFS and minus YP/NIS.=C2=A0

I'm puzzled about the "minus YP/NIS". I negotiated the IBM NF= S license
on behalf of AIX, but was inclusive of the rest of the company, so I
think ACIS put NFS into AOS under the auspices of that license. I
remember discussing with the Palo Alto ACIS folks at the time.

I only had AOS at home, without Ethernet, so wouldn't have tried to use=
NFS or YP. But I would have thought that ACIS would have included YP.

AOS de= finitely had NIS/YP. I remember it quite distinctly.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - Dan C.

--0000000000006b17180597debeb3--