From: Dan Cross <crossd@gmail.com>
To: Paul Ruizendaal <pnr@planet.nl>
Cc: "tuhs@tuhs.org" <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Origins of the frame buffer device
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:35:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEoi9W5wpdmtYd+FN+ONXeczHG0yAZogqcOez2ZjBkiMVqg5=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30409071-EB8E-4370-A1E6-8364FC3A662E@planet.nl>
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 10:06 AM Paul Ruizendaal <pnr@planet.nl> wrote:
> > On 8 Mar 2023, at 15:23, Dan Cross <crossd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I wouldn't try to be too rigid in your terms here. The term
> > "workstation" was probably never well-defined; it had more of an
> > intuitive connotation of a machine that was more powerful than
> > something you could get on the consumer market (like a PC or 8-bit
> > microcomputer), but wasn't a minicomputer or mainframe/supercomputer.
>
> Yes, I got a bit carried away there. The point I was trying to make was in context of the wheel of reincarnation, though: if the system is a Vax and a Blit, we could conceptually think of the Blit as an accelerated graphics card for the Vax, having made one full revolution. If this is nonsense, why is the Magnolia different?
I don't think it's nonsense. I do think it is reaching a bit to draw
an analogy that was probably unconsidered at the time, but that's ok.
I think the study of history turns up such things all the time.
- Dan C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-05 15:01 [TUHS] " Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS
2023-03-05 17:29 ` [TUHS] " Grant Taylor via TUHS
2023-03-05 18:25 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2023-03-06 8:51 ` Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS
2023-03-06 8:57 ` Rob Pike
2023-03-06 11:09 ` Henry Bent
2023-03-06 16:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-03-06 22:47 ` Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS
2023-03-06 23:10 ` Rob Pike
2023-03-08 12:53 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2023-03-08 14:23 ` Dan Cross
2023-03-08 15:06 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2023-03-08 19:35 ` Dan Cross [this message]
2023-03-08 16:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-03-08 17:46 ` Clem Cole
2023-03-08 17:45 ` Clem Cole
2023-03-08 18:12 ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-03-08 18:21 ` Larry McVoy
2023-03-08 18:43 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2023-03-08 18:45 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-03-08 22:44 ` Clem Cole
2023-03-09 14:42 ` Paul Winalski
2023-03-06 23:20 ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-03-07 1:24 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2023-03-08 3:07 ` Rob Gingell
2023-03-08 12:51 ` Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS
2023-03-08 13:05 ` Warner Losh
2023-03-08 13:17 ` Arno Griffioen via TUHS
2023-03-07 1:54 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2023-03-05 18:52 Noel Chiappa
2023-03-05 20:43 ` Rob Pike
2023-03-06 10:43 ` Jonathan Gray
2023-03-07 1:21 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2023-03-08 5:43 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2023-03-09 23:24 ` emanuel stiebler
2023-03-10 1:44 ` Lawrence Stewart
2023-03-06 23:16 Norman Wilson
2023-03-06 23:24 ` Larry McVoy
2023-03-07 12:08 ` arnold
2023-03-07 16:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEoi9W5wpdmtYd+FN+ONXeczHG0yAZogqcOez2ZjBkiMVqg5=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=crossd@gmail.com \
--cc=pnr@planet.nl \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).