Re: [TUHS] moving directories in svr2

[Dan Cross <crossd@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1791 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 1:23 PM Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 01:17:18PM -0500, Dan Cross wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 10:54 AM Adam Thornton <athornton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Slightly older, but also slightly more fundamental to the system, you
> need
> > > look no farther than Solaris's `/bin/sh` for an illustrated example of
> the
> > > pros and cons of maintaining backwards compatibility. [snip]
> > >
> >
> > Sun is not the exemplar here: the move from SunOS 4's BSD userland to
> > Solaris 2's SVR4 broke tons of things. They didn't seem to mind that
> their
> > customers had to pay the cost of adaptation.
>
> I was there for that and I minded like crazy.  It was a hugely bad move
> in my opinion.  Time has not changed that.
>

Yeah. I work on Illumos now for Oxide, and it's...fine? But it took a long
time to get there.

When the SunOS->Solaris changeover happened, the thing that really tripped
me up was `awk`. SunOS 4's awk was nawk, but Solaris 2's awk was 7th Ed awk
and lacked functions and so forth. nawk was available as `nawk`, but it
seemed like a gratuitous regression and we had to modify a lot of local
shell scripts and so on.

> The Linux example is also a bit strange. The move from e.g. `ifconfig` and
> > `netstat to `ip` and `ss` required lots of local retooling
>
> I never understood why Linux did that.
>

I've been dealing with a couple of Linux machines over the break, and
trying to do things the canonical way instead of running back to the
familiar tools, but some things just aren't supported. `ss` doesn't know
about some of the more exotic address families, like AX.25 and NET/ROM. I
can certainly understand why (talk about a hobbyist niche...) but the irony
is that I had to install `netstat` anyway.

>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2728 bytes --]