From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 25226 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2021 11:26:01 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jul 2021 11:26:01 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8E10B9C8B9; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 21:25:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7189A9C862; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 21:24:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ok+2ek81"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C5F0D9C862; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 21:24:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com (mail-oi1-f180.google.com [209.85.167.180]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCB79C861 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 21:24:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 22so10891121oix.10 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 04:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BNRk3OF0/PUvw87bnDRwNglUiCt5W7h8Ch7u/q7dt2E=; b=ok+2ek81e3ENoVvbQP3L4fkgu29G2tbV2a/QUoDIh5oBVRbDuMReCT5BlSHdbFZdQs 2dz1k3QNXeZtZQ99lOF411vLU9zCSrsJIHK5NVtFPMArd1i/YUdqIR/bBRB+mBKWW8R8 /sZ8ROtEZycf3Ls+nSLqqhMVD/nJHXjCe/uDDMO//+HCiGGanvIAEdsFjC9WWZrEfNqH eis0esHvlnDFliUf2PN7hRiDfDwAd9Z5Ks3tWJb4EjDoOYo0IITzfICZ5di3JSOyiNyO 2+SHSoovk3QnIksw4iHfHBS2FYuGOIWCsg0zX+/KLz1WVnB1z9cNH5z43sixA7FJv5gK WHDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BNRk3OF0/PUvw87bnDRwNglUiCt5W7h8Ch7u/q7dt2E=; b=XtFEKw7pJyGNvjo8sQzTAN205XOsLGEIAQesCxg42EXgZNf2xdckYBXFGv0LjdmpAY rOnh+vgP7UADWjlEbQ5LuCIg8y5vr339Tdo/4Ev0no0CyxIgwe2m3wc0a1cUbD0RTwlq TycyOGcQ1Rz2+NndG+gjjQTgxfzKewT1YtEIJkEDs2Je0EnL288cU1V+Ykj6ExBVJVzZ EQoZfFuh7OsGBBf4tV9x9KUbNz3sivh0lNaW1Fn6KxjLRDWAB143BeaeUcfDmgmbdz+d Sm7vp2dxUkWJkAH7Gpob7VLkhPmdk5Et/gZZYa9sgzbnZZTrus//WL70Cal8KDs9jsTE ZVyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qzpVS7vtKvABqEkewyeQeQ++zn+E/hAyD+5+lJZtSchgb36K9 htWUePBPe3pOUcVxxOyOTipLaaZLLGv5g7YzBRdhtCqUny4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPELaY7R1TSYVwXy4gRBo2Pl6Vma9qbnwusFAvk/jlf2fNyz8MBN4aEkbBSftqhLR9p0LS9IrBuy3N926dL8Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:209e:: with SMTP id s30mr3634328oiw.110.1625225092428; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 04:24:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dan Cross Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:24:16 -0400 Message-ID: To: Clem Cole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050769d05c62234a8" Subject: Re: [TUHS] First machine to run rogue? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000050769d05c62234a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Clem. I'm curious what other lore is out there: my suspicion is that rogue never ran on vanilla v6, but it would be great to validate. On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Clem Cole wrote: > I first got it on V7, as I said on our 11/70 for sure but I don=E2=80=99t= remember > if we had it on the 11/60 before that. > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:07 PM Dan Cross wrote: > >> What was the first machine to run rogue? I understand that it was writte= n >> by Glenn Wichman and Michael Toy at UC Santa Cruz ca. 1980, using the >> `curses` library (Ken Arnold's original, not Mary Ann's rewrite). I've s= een >> at least one place that indicates it first ran on 6th Edition, but that >> doesn't sound right to me. The first reference I can find in BSD is in 2= .79 >> ("rogue.doc"), which also appears to be the first release to ship curses= . >> >> Anyone have any info? Thanks! >> >> - Dan C. >> >> -- > Sent from a handheld expect more typos than usual > --00000000000050769d05c62234a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Clem. I'm curious what other lore is out there= : my suspicion is that rogue never ran on vanilla v6, but it would be great= to validate.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Clem Cole <clemc@ccc.com> wrote:
I first got it on V7, as I = said on our 11/70 for sure but I don=E2=80=99t remember if we had it on the= 11/60 before that. =C2=A0
--
Sent from a handheld expec= t more typos than usual
--00000000000050769d05c62234a8--