[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 789 bytes --] Sorry if this is a repost. No idea of the legality, and therefore no idea how long it will stay: https://twitter.com/nixcraft/status/1586276475614818305 is the tweet and https://github.com/Arquivotheca/SunOS-4.1.3 is the repository with this README, below. Many other OS's there too. README <https://github.com/Arquivotheca/SunOS-4.1.3#readme> This is the SunOS 4.1.3 SUNSRC CD-ROM. It contains the source in 3 forms. 1. plain text source, as a ufs tree, rooted at the top level of this filesystem. Symlinks to the SCCS hierarchy are in place. 2. SCCS hierarchy, rooted at SCCS_DIRECTORIES. 3. a tar image of the SCCS hierarchy, in a file named 4.1.3_SUNSRC.tar. This is rooted at ./SCCS_DIRECTORIES. Please see the SunOS 4.1.3 Source Installation Guide for further details. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1722 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --] Funny enough the only repo I clicked on that didn't work (didn't try all...) was the Unixware 7 because of course of all actors, whatever excrement is left of SCO *still* has a 40 foot pole up their unmentionables. - Matt G. ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, October 29th, 2022 at 10:41 AM, Rich Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if this is a repost. No idea of the legality, and therefore no idea how long it will stay: https://twitter.com/nixcraft/status/1586276475614818305 is the tweet and https://github.com/Arquivotheca/SunOS-4.1.3 is the repository with this README, below. Many other OS's there too. > > [README](https://github.com/Arquivotheca/SunOS-4.1.3#readme) > > This is the SunOS 4.1.3 SUNSRC CD-ROM. It contains the source in 3 forms. > > 1. plain text source, as a ufs tree, rooted at the top level of > this filesystem. Symlinks to the SCCS hierarchy are in place. > > 2. SCCS hierarchy, rooted at SCCS_DIRECTORIES. > > 3. a tar image of the SCCS hierarchy, in a file named 4.1.3_SUNSRC.tar. > This is rooted at ./SCCS_DIRECTORIES. > > Please see the SunOS 4.1.3 Source Installation Guide for further details. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2510 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --] On 10/29/22 1:38 PM, segaloco via TUHS wrote: > Funny enough the only repo I clicked on that didn't work (didn't try > all...) was the Unixware 7 because of course of all actors, whatever > excrement is left of SCO *still* has a 40 foot pole up their unmentionables. I checked many, if not most, of the repos and UnixWare 7 is the only one that I saw a DMCA take-down notice about. -- Grant. . . . unix || die [-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --] [-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4017 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 296 bytes --] On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:43 AM Rich Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com> wrote: > 3. a tar image of the SCCS hierarchy, in a file named 4.1.3_SUNSRC.tar. > This is rooted at ./SCCS_DIRECTORIES. > > Sadly, this doesn't appear to be the case. There's no SCCS files that I can find. Am I blind? Warner [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 946 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 214 bytes --] > Sadly, this doesn't appear to be the case. There's no SCCS files that I > can find. Am I blind? > I didn't look or verify anything. Larry also said no SCCS, so you're probably right. Maybe contact the author. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 804 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 436 bytes --] On Sat, Oct 29, 2022, 2:56 PM Rich Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sadly, this doesn't appear to be the case. There's no SCCS files that I >> can find. Am I blind? >> > > I didn't look or verify anything. Larry also said no SCCS, so you're > probably right. Maybe contact the author. > I've seen this same collections in various places on the internet in the past, so while disappointing, it doesn't surprise me. Warner > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1622 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 260 bytes --] On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, Warner Losh wrote: > I've seen this same collections in various places on the internet in the > past, so while disappointing, it doesn't surprise me. Are DMCA takedown orders allowed to be announced by the recipients? -- Dave
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 122 bytes --] > > > Are DMCA takedown orders allowed to be announced by the recipients? > Yes. It's common for providers to say so. > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 508 bytes --]