From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 44e28816 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 62FAF9C12E; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:04:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E765B93D9E; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:03:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IrG3iBGD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 985AE93D9E; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:03:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com (mail-vk1-f180.google.com [209.85.221.180]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050D193D24 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:03:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-vk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id k19so4966361vke.10 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:03:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t+h+6MSm1PLbiEpKYnW4gAu5HlX8hMy+9yZsVXgNuSE=; b=IrG3iBGDziBn5nZcobBBsxEyRFAqy5PxNYTXcBPx3PIZ0osSAjcsuLFFVz1l871aj7 3mBJEgnZOcaoWu9iRX9Q8CWH8sOPN7Lu2tgXpMhJcKFsFvj1sLbc3LxhqJGZLFZrGMru 9Jbb/Iqo/7Tkfg3e88rn2A1qJrFe0nRgRm3/griaFE0CYPigINgpylO+Qlc1pjyMap6s ov1I5nRZfwEx6yw5xnJdwt1FO+ilVlFrn5n2c4lQXy+P8KmZsqDMuYJ1SpYu2G7rR0SU QJqGE/qU3DM71W9P1hTlaV131oHo9FU5tbv0SnKbZoaLxIN2enxYUHTDCyRd2zqNP94C G39w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t+h+6MSm1PLbiEpKYnW4gAu5HlX8hMy+9yZsVXgNuSE=; b=HXDj289O87rd6wcQ+nLLYKUdcZ96Ty5U3cXOeRnQJg08FhW8FIqa9wmBr/NcNZ+8Ft yvrwF6FzXwJ598UwSMykFd/BsJ+pJuwzF1UCP8QkCi7UqgOdtSKa9pcdIv4FKZKXFl2i lnx+gv1mrgJrRA8yLoSnnHKwKCaovFaJrzJfn99NvbMjQjLMuLWP24e+8mBBdnzrzWYQ Po1VVzOTmrY34WcjcIAIKb6IjuEV4Ut4dnZDwuuC3fQCPb35NBhIBkxwt2yn5G9f2Jqt FFt7fAudYwF1Q2fzv3Ykwzf79vgGqXVCvq7YcmvlSGBwkJyisbpGQ4q95hygz8kXJdl1 n0Vw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUd/lNVxIz9rkwuAxLvxoNDZHRyvHABhGfo/wQP9/cniCf3m0io q4/Z5lmRHBAbTW+fsbqaoG0Emw63zTG7HNv2D1Al7g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQK10pW+TyUDkajg8AA8cbe+7UqzWQMRwRIMPmenpMWYX2hrPc6esU0ajHHq660ZcLPukwjewVtidbbNZzTI8= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:60ce:: with SMTP id u197mr15192207vkb.80.1572980634723; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:03:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Christopher Browne Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:03:42 -0500 Message-ID: To: Kevin Bowling Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8ac5105969e1786" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Amdahl UTS, AIX/370, AIX/ESA X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000f8ac5105969e1786 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 13:08, Kevin Bowling wrote: > Clem, > > The AIX/386 stuff is readily available http://ps-2.kev009.com/aixps2/ > and can run in virtualbox > > https://astr0baby.wordpress.com/2018/09/14/running-aix-1-3-inside-virtual-box-5-2-16/ > Wow, so the "x86" version of AIX truly existed! I had long heard rumour of this, and had heard of it from sources I was inclined to trust not to be making it up. The dates seem to decently explain the invisibility; introduction in 1992 and withdrawal in March 1995 left but a brief period of time when anyone would have been willing to acknowledge it as a product. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" --000000000000f8ac5105969e1786 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 13:08, Kevin Bowlin= g <kevin.bowling@kev009.com<= /a>> wrote:
Clem,

The AIX/386 stuff is readily available http://ps-2.kev009.com/aixps2/<= /a>
and can run in virtualbox
https://astr0ba= by.wordpress.com/2018/09/14/running-aix-1-3-inside-virtual-box-5-2-16/<= br clear=3D"all">

Wow, so the "x86&quo= t; version of AIX truly existed!

I had long heard = rumour of this, and had heard of it from sources I was inclined to trust no= t to be making it up.=C2=A0 The dates seem to decently explain the invisibi= lity; introduction in 1992 and withdrawal in March 1995 left but a brief pe= riod of time when anyone would have been willing to acknowledge it as a pro= duct.
--
When= confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
quest= ion, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
--000000000000f8ac5105969e1786--