From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 15ccafbf for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 04:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 60D0F9D72A; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:18:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413B99D71C; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:17:42 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="mFRHR3jB"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E428E9D71C; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:17:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA079D71B for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:17:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id c17so4988540ioc.4 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 20:17:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EjxY0Fk5tXEVNLbZ6Z02hx1iJSm8stsOhM1L8qbXQYU=; b=mFRHR3jBqUINlRaUKDL8FmN5MYEq+wdsZLhG/y5CI+CMGWeqVzm97Bb/CR8OjwItSX 1EsLJeajwb62QGKJGOpEoBKVwTNe/Bf7iwsbXn+9Hotuc4JWcR7+GEPd2q12IijutANi tZXHv/mK5F04bqgAgow+++qKeVQnkcN+/fR2a0XcG43T0cOc/BVnrAseVWqTPmAooubp dQjKEngMvwyqsYVkWuIgp0NU0iImjD2NUney/J75bhZgvs7SLI+qsnhR6KYD+dR4qK80 n8uggIbk1v3WsKZ5sScq/w3AY9goIDb/XcepszUsm/53QY71FnkFm1FVwT3zYxIP6bAC o7wQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EjxY0Fk5tXEVNLbZ6Z02hx1iJSm8stsOhM1L8qbXQYU=; b=uGmhidH3+Sc2CgzxH7hJ2kyQA6cZcygmx9pSNWrAar3bl2pEUygGMXjKBbgT2YB4sL 2/WmhdpgdX0qW6tE/fvVQG2Slg8sFNqR1JxWycU+uW4ux0nMqeFgjZzt7o9DtiLOC/wz a5/+nij/t/Mk/2Kh0P/5J4yzDRNK6Vmu2Qpm0Rp8f7802Uo3fYOHwLfwaPi04wXqV9bw FlHczd/vgMz3XKkP9zBD2YCgyJoDEwR/b9UF9IHl4doVFjTUtgUyEDOgurBhZnUKTpTY EmJV7LvJ8MdRGeXHk3XjF0ZSuYjt7g+v/ZPHixJv6JXqU0wmubs1/ATRl5vPANW2gDOo AnIA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3CwgzRftJSDl/Mnm+4IvWRAvsy+yykMqW7ii6PEhfnasfSsB0l nsb/bB/agRIpgCZuzCxcJDCuRnSUEZOtELluNZu11SEAhzQ4aA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt7j4QYgjY9qrEpA15qFF/CQW18J3JhDbRs1+rIhqNOUnMPi9r8J5mSWB2gK9xxr782KIy0nskIGaXBQdxCFgE= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7c04:: with SMTP id m4mr4982145iok.208.1583381858119; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 20:17:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200305020517.GA13872@wopr> In-Reply-To: <20200305020517.GA13872@wopr> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 20:17:26 -0800 Message-ID: To: Kurt H Maier Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032c41605a013d13f" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Command line options and complexity X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Ken Thompson via TUHS Reply-To: Ken Thompson Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000032c41605a013d13f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" do i get a prize: ls -tj /bin/ls: illegal option -- j usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...] On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 6:06 PM Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:17:46AM -0500, John P. Linderman wrote: > > I think that was a useful option, but the irony of Rob > > adding an option to "tac" was hard to overlook. > > tac came back from Jersey waving flags? > > khm > --00000000000032c41605a013d13f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
do i get a prize:

ls -tj
/bin/ls: il= legal option -- j
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [fi= le ...]

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 6:06 PM Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:17:46AM -0= 500, John P. Linderman wrote:
> I think that was a useful option, but the irony of Rob
> adding an option to "tac" was hard to overlook.

tac came back from Jersey waving flags?

khm
--00000000000032c41605a013d13f--