From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 28394 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2021 05:22:12 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Apr 2021 05:22:12 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 110359CAE0; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:22:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E69C723; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:21:30 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="NwIc/7fP"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5F3859C723; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:21:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-vs1-f43.google.com (mail-vs1-f43.google.com [209.85.217.43]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67179C722 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:21:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-vs1-f43.google.com with SMTP id g4so495706vsq.8 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 22:21:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OWQCdR5fjdmKnkOsLm14eketftbw6CMPBLxes3B0Bbo=; b=NwIc/7fPn488uxffjAcg5ex5IU7u41CZJ25D4RWPcGYQkJn00Bcqg51Ogp9cJuGYbe fW9S9th0GEHBenfD6ef/f5WHWl6/wllU1KcJWCzVCf7kB0qw2CZl6Ng8ZW9hphvHfSIw f+3Fn9MTF1O/kGb7Zyi/R5gee6vYGVSHfSPqgSPHsovLgMnytfwha+hHWY3CC4oKE9J/ BPNvepurQOYvtcLeLSXrVlZJhGraFoNdLX2rSTG8I6AJouLvT8oFdj+8VVRunTEnE7yj w8wSd8RruO0SqbtlcY0wdBQ068ucunH57lTVvtF+OLR3CWpLV0Ola5CK3kw6p2v3P00t XPag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OWQCdR5fjdmKnkOsLm14eketftbw6CMPBLxes3B0Bbo=; b=ocMcR2ZeLe7OMvO098NfhtZffripq7AVAGMEIw3d0segxLTvytJQyifeVmxtNeelga jtbvdgSZRFqbnFd8uXsdzLsFDZ6wGg68VgNew4axrQeMK5DOqqdCe0tdkqRIbU3/oJ5u kYP/CdKFlY/aowR4hd/AeNPd4FiTMr4AdDErUtIdvoRDjYIHNo8BG4ExKqp6RqqsZkbK VoKBzGBqXdTOE+TUYlkMjDlPAIv0c61tAwblXgixRP8uW+DHaQkdnoFHJk5mrgw7umxf TSLMSmsEuvy1N33/UE+zSHpx1/VgkSlx3IaqsUKzAf+KBEfO0ny+QWzGLAz1al0Hogon IeLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Gl1fd+TNDm0Ii57FneoUXNpdCfBhyFPJ9wTJpF7jvEvYDb9/m TyN0bN32TLdsvjRltCBpS4XJ/QHFI+nc59PtTLfSpsQc X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYR1NfWzPhUiiqrWtqHXXIHj3r9y7wvPi5zRM96ihdBWSoqCjv4fXKg8gNXkynhg8KQCj5fKDPw5iuXpukwTA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2d86:: with SMTP id t128mr4628325vst.30.1617859283746; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 22:21:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dan Stromberg Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 22:21:12 -0700 Message-ID: To: TUHS main list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7840905bf6f375c" Subject: [TUHS] Story about Microsoft and *ix X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000e7840905bf6f375c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I heard a while back, that the reason that Microsoft has avoided *ix so meticulously, was that back when they sold Xenix to SCO, as part of the deal Microsoft signed a noncompete agreement that prevented them from selling anything at all similar to *ix. True? --000000000000e7840905bf6f375c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I heard a while back, that the reason = that Microsoft has avoided *ix so meticulously, was that back when they sol= d Xenix to SCO, as part of the deal Microsoft signed a noncompete agreement= that prevented them from selling anything at all similar to *ix.

True?

--000000000000e7840905bf6f375c--