From: Noel Hunt <noel.hunt@gmail.com>
To: Norman Wilson <norman@oclsc.org>
Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: On the unreliability of LLM-based search results (was: Listing of early Unix source code from the Computer History Museum)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 06:36:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfO01yVzSJSm6YQcZsaSTM=_VCqQduh7Aa3vod2sXXuSZ6QHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7093F5EDCBB735E2C7C473314D40D5A.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 262 bytes --]
On Tue, 27 May 2025 at 02:40, Norman Wilson <norman@oclsc.org> wrote:
> an LLM is pretty much just a much-fancier and better-automated
> descendant of Mark V Shaney: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_V._Shaney
I am glad someone has finally pointed that out.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 831 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <F7093F5EDCBB735E2C7C473314D40D5A.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org>
2025-05-26 20:36 ` Noel Hunt [this message]
[not found] ` <CAKzdPgzNBUiT4GeQUnBX38+3dtNY=2Gw=9mFUy2anMoO4DUECg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-05-27 18:11 ` [TUHS] Mark V Shaney (Re: Re: On the unreliability of LLM-based search results (was: Listing of early Unix source code from the Computer History Museum)) Dan Cross
[not found] ` <CAEdTPBeFUcxAZWn1=mZnwTmF2a3DN-1GnXXB6WmV5gaqZHz1Lw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <769a9c94-055d-4bdd-a921-3e154c3b492f@infinitecactus.com>
[not found] ` <CAEdTPBcr2ajyAQh24LPtiQLBjfe2G2MYwoq8x_3bt6TzOT1_BA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-05-26 18:45 ` [TUHS] Wikipedia anecdotes - LLM generalizations [was On the unreliability of LLM-based search results (was: Listing of early Unix source code from the Computer History Museum) Charles H Sauer (he/him)
[not found] ` <87frgqequk.fsf@gmail.com>
2025-05-27 3:08 ` [TUHS] Re: On the unreliability of LLM-based search results George Michaelson
[not found] ` <DEBB648F-52A0-4E52-AC26-E2067FE7E0CD@humeweb.com>
[not found] ` <3e4339e9-bf9a-2b72-b47a-f20f81a153b5@makerlisp.com>
[not found] ` <202505312009.54VK97bQ4163488@freefriends.org>
[not found] ` <0adb7694-f99f-dafa-c906-d5502647aaf0@makerlisp.com>
[not found] ` <CAO2qRdMHAUHdPj9odydp3c9YwfaaU2pZiR6nmNS8O3r=rjKfWw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-05-31 22:47 ` [TUHS] Re: On the unreliability of LLM-based search results (was: Listing of early Unix source code from the Computer History Museum) Luther Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGfO01yVzSJSm6YQcZsaSTM=_VCqQduh7Aa3vod2sXXuSZ6QHw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=noel.hunt@gmail.com \
--cc=norman@oclsc.org \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).