From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: downing.nick+tuhs@gmail.com (Nick Downing) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:38:47 +1000 Subject: [TUHS] Need a new PDP-11 or VAX? In-Reply-To: <20130428013911.GD24560@mercury.ccil.org> References: <20130427224146.GR664@bitmover.com> <20130428013911.GD24560@mercury.ccil.org> Message-ID: I think the 68K came fairly close to what you guys are asking for, with its addressing modes like (a0)+ and so on. it's only 32 bit but that's better than 16 bit :) the problem I have with 68K is that while the assembly language is basically orthogonal the machine code is not, there are too many exceptions in the encoding, which I think was done to save precious code space. (Kind of like ARM Thumb code -- and by the way you may find ARM more PDP11-like than the other archs you mentioned). Anyway, some of the latest 68K such as Dragonball(?) have gone some way towards correcting this deficiency by not implementing many of the more irregular insns. cheers, Nick On Apr 28, 2013 12:00 PM, "John Cowan" wrote: > Larry McVoy scripsit: > > > What I'd like is a new 64 bit PDP-11. > > With a 16-bit instruction stream still, or with wider instructions and > more registers, almost but not quite entirely unlike the Vax? > > -- > De plichten van een docent zijn divers, John Cowan > die van het gehoor ook. cowan at ccil.org > --Edsger Dijkstra http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > _______________________________________________ > TUHS mailing list > TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: