From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 2795 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2022 20:59:29 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Mar 2022 20:59:29 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1CE569D4E8; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:59:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22519D009; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:58:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kev009.com header.i=@kev009.com header.b="tbN9UyQH"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BC45F9D009; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:57:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-yw1-f180.google.com (mail-yw1-f180.google.com [209.85.128.180]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB88B9D004 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:57:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yw1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2dc0364d2ceso179560887b3.7 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:57:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iMPFaNzLqROMNvtv2fl2mOQnA7jPvCtLX8SlRGAJSrM=; b=tbN9UyQHtrOu/yeh0n3EgO+nBpChheau5Sq8rUzc7Qc03j2vQ0Tiu1UmViwNMhKbMi u1iZXrFLjDafFWbpg2Y3lcZV5xeCTpI1RKkrrgimnQ4ns1B+QLFVfPgK1RVSIYEHAVgm zNTO/Jtrgh4hOn7eQnrWCZ0XGzETyQmxQWpE0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=iMPFaNzLqROMNvtv2fl2mOQnA7jPvCtLX8SlRGAJSrM=; b=6eGxlMqC9opgHvVsvwqw5hqH6eJQmjSjGbBO31GtBKas3kMczxy3IBDa5FI+MTeXB1 auXrbEvosGDLsuKv7V9zECSQv7w64TZOQcLS+ia219JQNEUYZpGlHoAjZn6rlk4MjQHc UNiXKPt+hcsAd0I4ulyAO+UX30eJdxgmQXJIBCJFMxeoGTItgh/BYbbLwDpjJl2Rk+m/ gcJcLD9UqOexPXvmjWsEviCdZw3sIPp9Sw/ytN1jNTNbJbuYxopkn2SGMH7rcybRhiCr /WWQ5N3RiOmRSt/Gg/rxjqZqbhMF2jf5yhwh4PR0RXgkCl77yu2NPXaT53efJhyO6Nn/ 0i5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FxrpgLfqm/liUXOtMo+PZFCa9/l48XRfki8o1JXOn8c05y4Zu TY6/ySAyKUUTweKnOk7tqNKjnsg/i9R0R/DDod1nFoVSATp5Cg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxTsOYHtk+eaJX4f4t9abBJ7Wzse/6MV3Ql7vECU7Q3q1phV3XDL5KuhvgDFGYPvc3geQdSBAWxSITfzrzmlY= X-Received: by 2002:a81:5c85:0:b0:2dc:5837:561d with SMTP id q127-20020a815c85000000b002dc5837561dmr10230370ywb.284.1646686633802; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:57:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Bowling Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 13:57:02 -0700 Message-ID: To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Documenter's Workbench versions X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 6:02 PM Kevin Bowling wrote: > > I am reading some UNIX text processing books and am interested in the > lineage of Documenter's Workbench. > > I see documentation of 1.0 (i.e > https://archive.org/details/sysv-dwb/page/n5/mode/2up) > I see a copy of 2.0 for 3B2 (i.e. > https://archives.loomcom.com/3b2/software/Documenters_Workbench/) > > From there things get a little less clear, it seems like we jump to > 3.2 with SysVR3.2? > > Then there is a 3.3 version https://github.com/n-t-roff/DWB3.3 > > One of my books from the late 80s references 3.4 available as a source > code purchase independent of UNIX. > > Then it appears SGI might have had a 4.x strain? (i.e. > https://archive.org/details/sgi_Documenters_Workbench_4.1.3) > > Heirloom is derived from OpenSolaris which is derived from? http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/doctools/troff.pdf has this particular history, interestingly it seems to be divergent from 2.x and not 3.x. > Can anyone firm this lineage up a bit; and is 4.x an SGI thing or what > (I extracted the image, the relnotes inside might as well not exist). > > Regards, > Kevin