The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [TUHS] Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?.
@ 2021-08-02 23:38 Douglas McIlroy
  2021-08-04  8:16 ` G. Branden Robinson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Douglas McIlroy @ 2021-08-02 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society

Another issue I have run into is recursion, when a reference includes
another reference. This comes up in various forms:
     Also published as ...
     Errata available at ...
     Summarized [or reviewed] in ...
     Preprint available at ...
Often such a reference takes the form of a URL or a page in a journal
or in a proceedings. This can be most succinctly placed in situ --
formatted consistently with other references. If the reference
identifies an alternate mode of publication, it may lack %A or %T
fields.

Partial proposal. a %O field may contain a reference, with no further
recursion, The contained reference will be formatted in line in the %O
text unless references are accumulated and the  contained reference is
not unique.

Doug

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-04  8:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-02 23:38 [TUHS] Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"? Douglas McIlroy
2021-08-04  8:16 ` G. Branden Robinson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).